» Articles » PMID: 39680474

Effect of Community-Based Integrated Care for Patients With Diabetes and Depression (CIC-PDD) in China: A Pragmatic Cluster-Randomized Trial

Overview
Journal Diabetes Care
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2024 Dec 16
PMID 39680474
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To develop a care model for patients with both diabetes and depression and assess the model's effectiveness.

Research Design And Methods: In this pragmatic cluster randomized trial, we allocated eight community health centers into two groups: the enhanced usual care group and the intervention group. A comprehensive care plan was developed for the intervention group based on the integrated care model. We recruited individuals aged ≥18 years with type 2 diabetes and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score ≥10). The primary outcome was the between-group difference in the percentage of patients who had at least a 50% reduction in depressive symptoms and a reduction of at least 0.5 percentage points in HbA1c. The outcome analysis was conducted within the intention-to-treat population; missing data were multiply imputed.

Results: We enrolled 630 participants, with 275 in the intervention group and 355 in the control group. A significantly greater percentage of patients in the intervention group met the primary outcome at 12 months (for depressive symptoms: risk difference [RD] 31.03% [62.06% vs. 31.02%, respectively; 95% CI 21.85-40.21]; for HbA1c: RD 19.16% [32.41% vs. 13.25%, respectively; 95% CI 11.35-26.97]). The patients in the intervention group showed significant enhancements in mental quality of life (mean difference [MD] 6.74 [46.57 vs. 39.83, respectively; 95% CI 3.75-9.74]), diabetes self-care activities (MD 0.69 [3.46 vs. 2.78, respectively; 95% CI 0.52-0.86]), medication adherence (MD 0.72 [6.49 vs. 5.78, respectively; 95% CI 0.37-1.07]), and experience of care (MD 0.89 [3.84 vs. 2.95, respectively; 95% CI 0.65-1.12]) at 12 months. Rural participants benefited more from the intervention.

Conclusions: The implementation strategy can serve as a valuable blueprint for the identification and treatment of patients with physical and mental multimorbidity in primary health care settings.

References
1.
Ware Jr J, Kosinski M, Keller S . A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996; 34(3):220-33. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003. View

2.
Zimmet P, Magliano D, Herman W, Shaw J . Diabetes: a 21st century challenge. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014; 2(1):56-64. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70112-8. View

3.
Petersen I, Kemp C, Rao D, Wagenaar B, Sherr K, Grant M . Implementation and Scale-Up of Integrated Depression Care in South Africa: An Observational Implementation Research Protocol. Psychiatr Serv. 2021; 72(9):1065-1075. PMC: 8410621. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000014. View

4.
Glasgow R, Wagner E, Schaefer J, Mahoney L, Reid R, Greene S . Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC). Med Care. 2005; 43(5):436-44. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000160375.47920.8c. View

5.
Duncan P, Murphy M, Man M, Chaplin K, Gaunt D, Salisbury C . Development and validation of the Multimorbidity Treatment Burden Questionnaire (MTBQ). BMJ Open. 2018; 8(4):e019413. PMC: 5900423. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019413. View