» Articles » PMID: 39680151

Stem Subsidence in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Retrospective Investigation of a Short Stem Using a Simple Measurement Approach

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a successful treatment for advanced hip joint diseases. More recently, short stems became increasingly popular, but stem subsidence remains a concern. This study investigates early short stem subsidence in a large patient cohort using a simple measurement approach for everyday practice.

Methods: This retrospective, single center, single implant design study included 1000 patients with primary THA. Subsidence was evaluated using standardized weight-bearing radiographs taken 3-5 days and 2-3 weeks postoperatively with full weight-bearing (FWB). A novel Subsidence Index (SID) was introduced to quantify stem subsidence in a simple and reproducible manner. The SID is calculated by averaging four distinct linear measurements between defined anatomical landmarks on the femur and the implant, captured on standard radiographs without additional software.

Results: Out of all analyzed patients 6% (60/1000) had subsidence of more than 3 mm. The mean subsidence was 1.3 mm (range, 0 to 16.25 mm). There were 0.6% (6) who underwent stem revision for symptomatic subsidence. Men and obese patients had greater subsidence. However, patient age, BMI, stems without lateral bone contact and other demographic factors were not associated with subsidence.

Conclusion: Early subsidence is relatively frequent with this uncemented short stem, however revisions are rare. Patients with risk factors should be counseled regarding FWB and radiographic controls should be performed. The SID provides an easy, non-invasive and inexpensive tool for early subsidence assessment; however, its simplicity limits its accuracy. Further research is needed in comparison to more elaborate methods.

Citing Articles

High subsidence rate in primary total hip arthroplasty with a taper wedge stem featuring a three-dimensionally printed porous structure.

Ishikura H, Masuyama Y, Fujita S, Nishiwaki T Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025; 145(1):188.

PMID: 40085230 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-025-05809-9.

References
1.
Young N, Cheah D, Waddell J, Wright J . Patient characteristics that affect the outcome of total hip arthroplasty: a review. Can J Surg. 1998; 41(3):188-95. PMC: 3950159. View

2.
Campbell D, Mercer G, Nilsson K, Wells V, Field J, Callary S . Early migration characteristics of a hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem: an RSA study. Int Orthop. 2009; 35(4):483-8. PMC: 3066322. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-009-0913-z. View

3.
Kutzner K, Ried E, Donner S, Bieger R, Pfeil J, Freitag T . Mid-term migration pattern of a calcar-guided short stem: A five-year EBRA-FCA-study. J Orthop Sci. 2020; 25(6):1015-1020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2020.01.001. View

4.
Budde S, Seehaus F, Schwarze M, Hurschler C, Floerkemeier T, Windhagen H . Analysis of migration of the Nanos® short-stem hip implant within two years after surgery. Int Orthop. 2015; 40(8):1607-1614. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2999-9. View

5.
Olsson S, JERNBERGER A, Tryggo D . Clinical and radiological long-term results after Charnley-Müller total hip replacement. A 5 to 10 year follow-up study with special reference to aseptic loosening. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981; 52(5):531-42. DOI: 10.3109/17453678108992143. View