No-touch Technique for Saphenous Vein Graft Harvesting in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Safely Improves Graft Patency: a Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview

Journal Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

Publisher Springer

Date 2024 Dec 16

PMID 39679091

Authors

Tri Wisesa Soetisna

Ahmad Muslim Hidayat Thamrin

Mahardika Budjana Sutan Ilham

Marko Darmawan

Faris Maulana Irfan

Vicky Supit

Sugisman

Dudy Arman Hanafy

Amin Tjubandi

Dicky Aligheri Wartono

Wirya Ayu Graha

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: The no-touch (NT) technique for saphenous vein graft (SVG) harvesting has been gaining popularity as several trials have shown its superiority in maintaining graft patency. However, this technique's clinical outcome and safety are still disputed and the results vary widely. The aim of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was to assess the effectiveness and safety of this method.

Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were conducted for this systematic review and meta-analysis. A comprehensive search of the literature was carried out with Embase, Scopus, and PubMed databases. The articles underwent extensive evaluation and analysis.

Results: Six RCTs comparing the NT and conventional (CON) techniques were included. Primary outcomes were measured using graft occlusion. Graft failure rates and clinical outcomes including major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), all-cause death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and leg wound complications were evaluated as secondary outcomes. The NT technique significantly decreased graft occlusion (risk ratio (RR) = 0.58; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.46 to 0.72; < 0.001) and failure (RR = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.54 to 0.77; < 0.001). Safety analysis also showed no significant risk difference for clinical outcomes, and although significantly higher, leg complications in the NT technique are minor and avoidable.

Conclusion: The NT technique increases long-term graft patency with no significant risk difference for clinical outcomes compared to the CON technique. However, the leg wound complications are significantly higher in the NT technique compared to the CON technique.

Graphical Abstract:

References

Samano N, Geijer H, Liden M, Fremes S, Bodin L, Souza D . The no-touch saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass grafting maintains a patency, after 16 years, comparable to the left internal thoracic artery: A randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015; 150(4):880-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.07.027. View

Hou X, Zhang K, Liu T, Li Y, Zhao Y, Song B . The expansion of no-touch harvesting sequential vein graft after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. J Card Surg. 2021; 36(7):2381-2388. PMC: 8252464. DOI: 10.1111/jocs.15577. View

Souza D, Johansson B, Bojo L, Karlsson R, Geijer H, Filbey D . Harvesting the saphenous vein with surrounding tissue for CABG provides long-term graft patency comparable to the left internal thoracic artery: results of a randomized longitudinal trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006; 132(2):373-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.04.002. View

Dashwood M . No-Touch Saphenous Vein - Vascular Damage and the London Connection. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2022; 37(Spec 1):1-6. PMC: 9454283. DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2022-0024. View

Souza D, Dashwood M, Tsui J, Filbey D, Bodin L, Johansson B . Improved patency in vein grafts harvested with surrounding tissue: results of a randomized study using three harvesting techniques. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002; 73(4):1189-95. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03425-2. View

Souza D . A new no-touch preparation technique. Technical notes. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996; 30(1):41-4. DOI: 10.3109/14017439609107239. View

Elmaghraby K, Demitry S, Hasaballah E, Razik N . Multi-slice CT coronary angiography versus invasive coronary angiography in the assessment of graft patency after coronary artery bypasses graft surgery. Egypt Heart J. 2023; 75(1):100. PMC: 10700234. DOI: 10.1186/s43044-023-00424-8. View

Baumann F, Catinella F, Cunningham Jr J, SPENCER F . Vein contraction and smooth muscle cell extensions as causes of endothelial damage during graft preparation. Ann Surg. 1981; 194(2):199-211. PMC: 1345241. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198108000-00015. View

Tian M, Wang X, Sun H, Feng W, Song Y, Lu F . No-Touch Versus Conventional Vein Harvesting Techniques at 12 Months After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: Multicenter Randomized, Controlled Trial. Circulation. 2021; 144(14):1120-1129. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.055525. View

10.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010; 8(5):336-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007. View

11.

Pettersen O, Wiseth R, Hegbom K, Nordhaug D . Pedicled Vein Grafts in Coronary Surgery Exhibit Reduced Intimal Hyperplasia at 6 Months. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 68(4):427-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.04.058. View

12.

Lo C, Mertz D, Loeb M . Newcastle-Ottawa Scale: comparing reviewers' to authors' assessments. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014; 14:45. PMC: 4021422. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-45. View

13.

Sabik 3rd J . Understanding saphenous vein graft patency. Circulation. 2011; 124(3):273-5. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.039842. View

14.

Deb S, Singh S, de Souza D, Chu M, Whitlock R, Meyer S . SUPERIOR SVG: no touch saphenous harvesting to improve patency following coronary bypass grafting (a multi-Centre randomized control trial, NCT01047449). J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019; 14(1):85. PMC: 6498551. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-019-0887-x. View

15.

Verma S, Lovren F, Pan Y, Yanagawa B, Deb S, Karkhanis R . Pedicled no-touch saphenous vein graft harvest limits vascular smooth muscle cell activation: the PATENT saphenous vein graft study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013; 45(4):717-25. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt560. View

16.

Sterne J, Hernan M, Reeves B, Savovic J, Berkman N, Viswanathan M . ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016; 355:i4919. PMC: 5062054. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i4919. View

17.

Taggart D . How I deploy arterial grafts. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018; 7(5):690-697. PMC: 6219946. DOI: 10.21037/acs.2018.09.06. View

18.

Pettersen O, Haram P, Winnerkvist A, Karevold A, Wahba A, Stenvik M . Pedicled Vein Grafts in Coronary Surgery: Perioperative Data From a Randomized Trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017; 104(4):1313-1317. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.03.076. View

19.

Klima U, Elsebay A, Gantri M, Bangardt J, Miller G, Emery R . Computerized tomographic angiography in patients having eSVS Mesh(R) supported coronary saphenous vein grafts: intermediate term results. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014; 9(1):138. PMC: 4413552. DOI: 10.1186/1749-8090-9-126. View

20.

Souza D, Bomfim V, Skoglund H, Dashwood M, Borowiec J, Bodin L . High early patency of saphenous vein graft for coronary artery bypass harvested with surrounding tissue. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001; 71(3):797-800. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)02508-x. View