» Articles » PMID: 39678432

Exploring Youths' Cannabis Health Literacy Post Legalization: A Qualitative Study

Overview
Journal J Adolesc Res
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2024 Dec 16
PMID 39678432
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Legalization of non-medical cannabis in Canada was intended to protect youth health and safety by limiting access and raising awareness of safety and risks. The purpose of this qualitative research was to explore youths' perceptions of their cannabis health literacy and future educational needs. A convenience sample of youth aged 13 to 18 residing in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada who may or may not have consumed cannabis were included. A qualitative study using virtual focus groups with semi-structured interview questions was conducted. Ethics approval was obtained. All sessions were audio-recorded and transcribed. Inductive thematic analysis used a social-ecological framework for adolescent health literacy. Six focus groups ( = 38) were conducted with youth of all ages and from rural and urban areas. Three main themes were identified: (i) micro influences (age, gender, and beliefs), (ii) meso influences, (family, peers, and school enforcement), (iii) macro influences (cannabis legalization and social media), and (iv) evidence-informed information (harm reduction and cannabis properties). They desired evidence-informed education using harm-reduction principles, integrated early, and interactive. The findings provide support for a cannabis health literacy framework that will inform youth cannabis education programs. Interactive approaches with real-world application should support their autonomy, share knowledge, and minimize stigma.

Citing Articles

A survey of educator perspectives toward teaching harm reduction cannabis education.

Downey M, Bishop L, Donnan J, Rowe E, Harris N PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0299085.

PMID: 38718060 PMC: 11078393. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299085.

References
1.
Jensen C, Cushing C, Aylward B, Craig J, Sorell D, Steele R . Effectiveness of motivational interviewing interventions for adolescent substance use behavior change: a meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011; 79(4):433-40. DOI: 10.1037/a0023992. View

2.
Allara E, Ferri M, Bo A, Gasparrini A, Faggiano F . Are mass-media campaigns effective in preventing drug use? A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(9):e007449. PMC: 4563251. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007449. View

3.
Jacobus J, Tapert S . Effects of cannabis on the adolescent brain. Curr Pharm Des. 2013; 20(13):2186-93. PMC: 3930618. DOI: 10.2174/13816128113199990426. View

4.
E Blevins C, Banes K, Stephens R, Walker D, Roffman R . Change in motives among frequent cannabis-using adolescents: Predicting treatment outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016; 167:175-81. PMC: 5037028. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.08.018. View

5.
Tremblay M, Baydala L, Khan M, Currie C, Morley K, Burkholder C . Primary Substance Use Prevention Programs for Children and Youth: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics. 2020; 146(3). DOI: 10.1542/peds.2019-2747. View