» Articles » PMID: 39671306

Cell-autonomous Timing Drives the Vertebrate Segmentation Clock's Wave Pattern

Overview
Journal Elife
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Dec 13
PMID 39671306
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rhythmic and sequential segmentation of the growing vertebrate body relies on the segmentation clock, a multi-cellular oscillating genetic network. The clock is visible as tissue-level kinematic waves of gene expression that travel through the presomitic mesoderm (PSM) and arrest at the position of each forming segment. Here, we test how this hallmark wave pattern is driven by culturing single maturing PSM cells. We compare their cell-autonomous oscillatory and arrest dynamics to those we observe in the embryo at cellular resolution, finding similarity in the relative slowing of oscillations and arrest in concert with differentiation. This shows that cell-extrinsic signals are not required by the cells to instruct the developmental program underlying the wave pattern. We show that a cell-autonomous timing activity initiates during cell exit from the tailbud, then runs down in the anterior-ward cell flow in the PSM, thereby using elapsed time to provide positional information to the clock. Exogenous FGF lengthens the duration of the cell-intrinsic timer, indicating extrinsic factors in the embryo may regulate the segmentation clock via the timer. In sum, our work suggests that a noisy cell-autonomous, intrinsic timer drives the slowing and arrest of oscillations underlying the wave pattern, while extrinsic factors in the embryo tune this timer's duration and precision. This is a new insight into the balance of cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic mechanisms driving tissue patterning in development.

Citing Articles

Progress in understanding the vertebrate segmentation clock.

Isomura A, Kageyama R Nat Rev Genet. 2025; .

PMID: 40038453 DOI: 10.1038/s41576-025-00813-6.


Oscillatory control of embryonic development.

Chandel A, Keseroglu K, Ozbudak E Development. 2024; 151(9).

PMID: 38727565 PMC: 11128281. DOI: 10.1242/dev.202191.

References
1.
Venzin O, Oates A . What are you synching about? Emerging complexity of Notch signaling in the segmentation clock. Dev Biol. 2019; 460(1):40-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2019.06.024. View

2.
Ay A, Holland J, Sperlea A, Devakanmalai G, Knierer S, Sangervasi S . Spatial gradients of protein-level time delays set the pace of the traveling segmentation clock waves. Development. 2014; 141(21):4158-67. PMC: 4302894. DOI: 10.1242/dev.111930. View

3.
Preibisch S, Amat F, Stamataki E, Sarov M, Singer R, Myers E . Efficient Bayesian-based multiview deconvolution. Nat Methods. 2014; 11(6):645-8. PMC: 4153441. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2929. View

4.
Brody T, Odenwald W . Programmed transformations in neuroblast gene expression during Drosophila CNS lineage development. Dev Biol. 2000; 226(1):34-44. DOI: 10.1006/dbio.2000.9829. View

5.
Simsek M, Ozbudak E . Spatial Fold Change of FGF Signaling Encodes Positional Information for Segmental Determination in Zebrafish. Cell Rep. 2018; 24(1):66-78.e8. PMC: 6063364. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.023. View