» Articles » PMID: 39671172

Nonpharmaceutical Interventions and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in School-Age Preterm Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review

Overview
Date 2024 Dec 13
PMID 39671172
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To systematically review nonpharmaceutical interventions aiming to enhance neurodevelopment in preterm children and adolescents (aged 4-18 years).

Method: A systematic review of the literature was conducted for all studies published up to May 1, 2022, across Medline, Web of Science, and PsycINFO databases. Studies were evaluated for inclusion by 2 independent reviewers using predetermined inclusion criteria. The Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) tools were used to assess bias in the selected studies.

Results: Of the 1778 articles identified, 23 were included. Quality assessment revealed moderate bias in 52.2%, low bias in 21.7%, and serious bias in 26.1%. The selected studies comprised 60.9% randomized controlled trials and 21.7% pre- versus postdesigns. Interventions included Cogmed Working Memory Training® (43.5%), BrainGame Brian (13%), physiotherapy (13%), and others (30.4%). Qualitative analysis showed the limited impact of interventions on neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm children aged 4-18 years.

Conclusion: Despite recent efforts to use more rigorous methodologies, current research on school-age interventions for preterm neurodevelopment exhibits methodological limitations. There is a pressing need for well-designed, large-scale clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of nonpharmaceutical interventions in this vulnerable population.

References
1.
Beltran M, Dudink J, de Jong T, Benders M, van den Hoogen A . Sensory-based interventions in the NICU: systematic review of effects on preterm brain development. Pediatr Res. 2021; 92(1):47-60. DOI: 10.1038/s41390-021-01718-w. View

2.
Kelly C, Thompson D, Chen J, Josev E, Pascoe L, Spencer-Smith M . Working memory training and brain structure and function in extremely preterm or extremely low birth weight children. Hum Brain Mapp. 2019; 41(3):684-696. PMC: 6977425. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24832. View

3.
Johnson S, Strauss V, Gilmore C, Jaekel J, Marlow N, Wolke D . Learning disabilities among extremely preterm children without neurosensory impairment: Comorbidity, neuropsychological profiles and scholastic outcomes. Early Hum Dev. 2016; 103:69-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2016.07.009. View

4.
van Houdt C, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis A, Oosterlaan J, Konigs M, Koopman-Esseboom C, Laarman A . Executive function training in very preterm children: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020; 30(5):785-797. PMC: 7250540. DOI: 10.1007/s00787-020-01561-0. View

5.
Grunewaldt K, Lohaugen G, Austeng D, Brubakk A, Skranes J . Working memory training improves cognitive function in VLBW preschoolers. Pediatrics. 2013; 131(3):e747-54. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-1965. View