» Articles » PMID: 39661171

A Latent Profile Analysis of Spiritual Well-being and Their Relation to Perceived Social Support and Hope in Patients with Early-stage Lung Cancer

Overview
Specialties Critical Care
Oncology
Date 2024 Dec 11
PMID 39661171
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the subtypes of spiritual well-being among patients with early-stage lung cancer, examine the characteristics of each subtype, and determine the relationship between spiritual well-being and perceived social support as well as hope within these subtypes.

Methods: A sample of 418 patients with early-stage lung cancer from three hospitals in Hubei Province completed the general sociodemographic questionnaire, the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being, the Perceived Social Support Scale, and the Herth Hope Index. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to identify the patterns of spiritual well-being in patients with early-stage lung cancer, and influencing factors of different patterns were identified by univariate analysis and multinomial logistic regression analysis.

Results: Three latent classes were identified: the "low spiritual well-being" (C1, 33.97%), the "moderate spiritual well-being" (C2, 38.28%), and the "high spiritual well-being" (C3, 27.75%). Factors such as nationality, religion, annual household disposable income, perceived social support scores, and hope scores influenced the potential categories of spiritual well-being in patients with early-stage lung cancer.

Conclusions: The spiritual well-being of patients with early-stage lung cancer varies, necessitating customized spiritual care to meet the diverse needs of patients. Additionally, providing comprehensive social support and helping patients achieve positive states of spiritual well-being can promote better cancer treatment outcomes.

References
1.
Zhang Y, Pan X, Chen J, Cao A, Zhang Y, Xia L . Combined lifestyle factors, incident cancer, and cancer mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Br J Cancer. 2020; 122(7):1085-1093. PMC: 7109112. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-0741-x. View

2.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel R, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A . Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71(3):209-249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660. View

3.
Zeng H, Chen W, Zheng R, Zhang S, Ji J, Zou X . Changing cancer survival in China during 2003-15: a pooled analysis of 17 population-based cancer registries. Lancet Glob Health. 2018; 6(5):e555-e567. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30127-X. View

4.
Chapple A, Ziebland S, McPherson A . Stigma, shame, and blame experienced by patients with lung cancer: qualitative study. BMJ. 2004; 328(7454):1470. PMC: 428516. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38111.639734.7C. View

5.
Sutton T, Koprowski M, Grossblatt-Wait A, Brown S, McCarthy G, Liu B . Psychosocial distress is dynamic across the spectrum of cancer care and requires longitudinal screening for patient-centered care. Support Care Cancer. 2022; 30(5):4255-4264. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-06814-z. View