» Articles » PMID: 39659830

Ion Channel Modulator DPI-201-106 Significantly Enhances Antitumor Activity of DNA Damage Response Inhibitors in Glioblastoma

Abstract

Background: Glioblastoma, a lethal high-grade glioma, has not seen improvements in clinical outcomes in nearly 30 years. Ion channels are increasingly associated with tumorigenesis, and there are hundreds of brain-penetrant drugs that inhibit ion channels, representing an untapped therapeutic resource. The aim of this exploratory drug study was to screen an ion channel drug library against patient-derived glioblastoma cells to identify new treatments for brain cancer.

Methods: Seventy-two ion channel inhibitors were screened in patient-derived glioblastoma cells, and cell viability was determined using the ViaLight Assay. Cell cycle and apoptosis analysis were determined with flow cytometry using PI and Annexin V staining, respectively. Protein and phosphoprotein expression was determined using mass spectrometry and analyzed using gene set enrichment analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed using intracranial xenograft models of GBM6 and WK1 cells.

Results: The voltage-gated sodium channel modulator, DPI-201-106, was revealed to reduce glioblastoma cell viability in vitro by inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Phosphoproteomics indicated that DPI-201-106 may impact DNA damage response (DDR) pathways. Combination treatment of DPI-201-106 with the CHK1 inhibitor prexasertib or the PARP inhibitor niraparib demonstrated synergistic effects in multiple patient-derived glioblastoma cells both in vitro and in intracranial xenograft mouse models, extending survival of glioblastoma-bearing mice.

Conclusions: DPI-201-106 enhances the efficacy of DDR inhibitors to reduce glioblastoma growth. As these drugs have already been clinically tested in humans, repurposing DPI-201-106 in novel combinatorial approaches will allow for rapid translation into the clinic.

References
1.
Shi D, Guo J, Hoffman H, Su J, Mino-Kenudson M, Barth J . Therapeutic avenues for cancer neuroscience: translational frontiers and clinical opportunities. Lancet Oncol. 2022; 23(2):e62-e74. PMC: 9516432. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00596-9. View

2.
Krafte D, DAVISON K, Dugrenier N, Estep K, Josef K, Barchi R . Pharmacological modulation of human cardiac Na+ channels. Eur J Pharmacol. 1994; 266(3):245-54. DOI: 10.1016/0922-4106(94)90133-3. View

3.
Ison G, Howie L, Amiri-Kordestani L, Zhang L, Tang S, Sridhara R . FDA Approval Summary: Niraparib for the Maintenance Treatment of Patients with Recurrent Ovarian Cancer in Response to Platinum-Based Chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2018; 24(17):4066-4071. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0042. View

4.
Simoens S, Huys I . R&D Costs of New Medicines: A Landscape Analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021; 8:760762. PMC: 8576181. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.760762. View

5.
Sarkaria J, Carlson B, Schroeder M, Grogan P, Brown P, Giannini C . Use of an orthotopic xenograft model for assessing the effect of epidermal growth factor receptor amplification on glioblastoma radiation response. Clin Cancer Res. 2006; 12(7 Pt 1):2264-71. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2510. View