» Articles » PMID: 39656291

Genome Location, Evolution and Centromeric Contribution of Satellite DNAs Shared Between the Two Closely Related Species Drosophila Serido and D. Antonietae (repleta Group, Buzzatii Cluster)

Overview
Journal Chromosoma
Specialty Molecular Biology
Date 2024 Dec 10
PMID 39656291
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Satellite DNAs are highly repetitive, tandemly arranged sequences, typically making up large portions (> 20%) of the eukaryotic genome. Most satDNAs are fast evolving and changes in their abundance and nucleotide composition may be related to genetic incompatibilities between species. Here, we used Illumina paired-end sequencing raw data and graph-based read-clustering with the TAREAN bioinformatic tool to study the satDNAs in two cactophilic neotropical cryptic species of Drosophila from the buzzatii cluster (repleta group), D. serido and D. antonietae, from five localities in Brazil. Both species share the same four families of satDNAs: pBuM, DBC-150, CDSTR138 and CDSTR230. They represent less than 4% of the genomic DNA and there are no large differences in the abundance of each satDNA between species. Despite not being the most abundant satDNA, CDSTR138 was found to be associated with most centromeres. All four satDNAs showed instances where repeats are more homogeneous within than between species, a phenomenon known as concerted evolution. On the other hand, there was no evidence for concerted evolution at the population level. Thus, these satDNAs may also be useful as potential markers for species identification. The low levels of satDNA differentiation (both quantitatively as qualitatively) between the two species might be among the reasons that allowed the establishment of a hybrid zone between the two species in the southern coast of Brazil.

Citing Articles

Unraveling the role of satellite DNAs in the evolution of the giant XY sex chromosomes of the flea beetle Omophoita octoguttata (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae).

Vidal J, Charlesworth D, Utsunomia R, Garrido-Ramos M, Dos Santos R, Porto-Foresti F BMC Biol. 2025; 23(1):53.

PMID: 39984886 PMC: 11846391. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-025-02155-5.

References
1.
Afgan E, Baker D, Batut B, van den Beek M, Bouvier D, cech M . The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 46(W1):W537-W544. PMC: 6030816. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky379. View

2.
Barrios-Leal D, Menezes R, Ribeiro J, Bizzo L, Melo de Sene F, Neves-da-Rocha J . A holocenic and dynamic hybrid zone between two cactophilic Drosophila species in a coastal lowland plain of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. J Evol Biol. 2021; 34(11):1737-1751. DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13934. View

3.
Biscotti M, Olmo E, Heslop-Harrison J . Repetitive DNA in eukaryotic genomes. Chromosome Res. 2015; 23(3):415-20. DOI: 10.1007/s10577-015-9499-z. View

4.
Charlesworth B, Sniegowski P, Stephan W . The evolutionary dynamics of repetitive DNA in eukaryotes. Nature. 1994; 371(6494):215-20. DOI: 10.1038/371215a0. View

5.
Craddock E, Gall J, Jonas M . Hawaiian Drosophila genomes: size variation and evolutionary expansions. Genetica. 2016; 144(1):107-24. DOI: 10.1007/s10709-016-9882-5. View