» Articles » PMID: 39654984

Comparative Evaluation of CEUS and CECT in the Detection of Liver Metastases of Middle and Low Rectal Cancer

Overview
Journal Int J Gen Med
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Dec 10
PMID 39654984
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To explore the imaging manifestations and clinical application value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in liver metastases of middle and low rectal cancer by performing CEUS in patients. Additionally, we compared the results of CEUS with those of abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) to assess the reliability of diagnosing liver metastases in patients with middle and low rectal cancer.

Methods: Hepatic CEUS was performed in 1095 patients with middle and low rectal cancer, and all patients underwent abdominal CECT examinations to determine the presence or absence of liver metastases. The results of both examinations were compared to evaluate the value of hepatic CEUS for detecting liver metastases in patients with middle and low rectal cancer.

Results: Among 1095 patients with middle and low rectal cancer, 132 were diagnosed with liver metastases of middle and low rectal cancer. 130 cases of liver metastases of rectal cancer were identified using hepatic CEUS, whereas 126 cases were identified using abdominal CECT. The detection rates of hepatic CEUS and abdominal CECT for liver metastases of middle and low rectal cancer showed no statistically significant differences ( > 0.05). The Kappa value for the diagnosis of liver metastases of middle and low rectal cancer between hepatic CEUS and abdominal CECT was 0.974 ( < 0.001), indicating good consistency between the two imaging modalities in detecting liver metastases of middle and low rectal cancer.

Conclusion: Hepatic CEUS can be used to diagnose liver metastases in middle and low rectal cancer, providing crucial imaging evidence for clinical treatment planning. It exhibited higher sensitivity than that of abdominal CECT in diagnosing liver metastases of middle and low rectal cancer, enabling the identification of higher number of liver metastases of middle and low rectal cancer cases.

References
1.
Margonis G, Sergentanis T, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Andreatos N, Tzanninis I, Sasaki K . Impact of Surgical Margin Width on Recurrence and Overall Survival Following R0 Hepatic Resection of Colorectal Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2017; 267(6):1047-1055. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002552. View

2.
Engstrand J, Nilsson H, Stromberg C, Jonas E, Freedman J . Colorectal cancer liver metastases - a population-based study on incidence, management and survival. BMC Cancer. 2018; 18(1):78. PMC: 5769309. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3925-x. View

3.
Xu J, Fan J, Qin X, Cai J, Gu J, Wang S . Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and comprehensive treatment of colorectal liver metastases (version 2018). J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018; 145(3):725-736. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-018-2795-1. View

4.
Zhang L, Zhang L, Wang H, Chen L, Sui G . Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for detecting colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis. 2019; 51(9):1241-1248. DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.06.004. View

5.
Qin S, Liu G, Huang M, Huang J, Luo Y, Wen Y . The local efficacy and influencing factors of ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation in colorectal liver metastases: a review of a 4-year experience at a single center. Int J Hyperthermia. 2018; 36(1):36-43. DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2018.1528511. View