» Articles » PMID: 39654866

Critical Appraisal of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Otitis Media in Asian and Western Countries with Consideration of Updates: A Narrative Review

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2024 Dec 10
PMID 39654866
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Acute otitis media is a common disease in children under the age of 5 years due to their primitive ear anatomy. One of its consequences is otitis media with effusion (OME), which is a condition wherein serous secretion accumulates in the middle ear due to Eustachian tube dysfunction. OME results in conductive hearing loss, impacting children's learning and development. This review aimed to identify discrepancies in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for managing OME in children across Asian and Western countries, focusing on updates to these guidelines.

Methods: A comparative review involving critical appraisal using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool was conducted. CPGs for managing ear effusion in children in Western and Asian countries published in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Science Direct databases were reviewed. Four CPGs from Western countries (Scotland, England, the United States of America and France) and three CPGs from Asian countries (Japan, Korea and Malaysia) were selected.

Results: There was a mild discrepancy regarding conducting surgery after 3 months, particularly myringotomy and adenoidectomy with or without grommets, between the Scottish CPG and other CPGs.

Conclusion: Asian CPGs for the management of OME share many similarities with Western CPGs. However, Asian CPGs tend to be stronger in most domains and levels of evidence. Japanese and American CPGs are up to date as of 2022 and 2016, respectively, while other CPGs are outdated for about 10 years.

References
1.
Crawford B, Mohd Hashim S, Prepageran N, See G, Meier G, Wada K . Impact of Pediatric Acute Otitis Media on Child and Parental Quality of Life and Associated Productivity Loss in Malaysia: A Prospective Observational Study. Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2016; 4(1):21-31. PMC: 5332310. DOI: 10.1007/s40801-016-0099-9. View

2.
Grimshaw J, Eccles M, Thomas R, MacLennan G, Ramsay C, Fraser C . Toward evidence-based quality improvement. Evidence (and its limitations) of the effectiveness of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies 1966-1998. J Gen Intern Med. 2006; 21 Suppl 2:S14-20. PMC: 2557130. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00357.x. View

3.
Siering U, Eikermann M, Hausner E, Hoffmann-Esser W, Neugebauer E . Appraisal tools for clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2013; 8(12):e82915. PMC: 3857289. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082915. View

4.
Burgers J, Fervers B, Haugh M, Brouwers M, Browman G, Philip T . International assessment of the quality of clinical practice guidelines in oncology using the Appraisal of Guidelines and Research and Evaluation Instrument. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22(10):2000-7. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.157. View

5.
Monasta L, Ronfani L, Marchetti F, Montico M, Vecchi Brumatti L, Bavcar A . Burden of disease caused by otitis media: systematic review and global estimates. PLoS One. 2012; 7(4):e36226. PMC: 3340347. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036226. View