» Articles » PMID: 39652543

The Impact of Host Genetics on Porcine Gut Microbiota Composition Excluding Maternal and Postnatal Environmental Influences

Abstract

The gut microbiota of the pig is being increasingly studied due to its implications for host homeostasis and the importance of the pig as a meat source and biomedical model of human diseases. However, most studies comparing the microbiome between different breeds do not consider the influence of maternal environment during the colonization of the microbiota. The aim of the present study was to compare the gut microbiota during postnatal growth between two pig genotypes (purebred Iberian vs. crossbreds Iberian x Large White pigs), gestated in a single maternal environment (pure Iberian mothers) inseminated with heterospermic semen. Postnatally, piglets were maintained in the same environmental conditions, and their microbiota was studied at 60 and 210 days old. Results showed that age had the greatest influence on alpha and beta diversity, and genotype also affected beta diversity at both ages. There were differences in the microbiome profile between genotypes at the ASV and genus levels when jointly analyzing the total number of samples, which may help to explain phenotypical differences. When each time-point was analyzed individually, there were more differences at 210 days-old than 60 days-old. Fecal short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) were also affected by age, but not by genotype. These results may be a basis for further research on host genotype interactions with the gut microbiota.

Citing Articles

Characterization of microbiota signatures in Iberian pig strains using machine learning algorithms.

Azouggagh L, Ibanez-Escriche N, Martinez-Alvaro M, Varona L, Casellas J, Negro S Anim Microbiome. 2025; 7(1):13.

PMID: 39901297 PMC: 11789298. DOI: 10.1186/s42523-025-00378-z.

References
1.
Klindworth A, Pruesse E, Schweer T, Peplies J, Quast C, Horn M . Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 41(1):e1. PMC: 3592464. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks808. View

2.
Butel M, Waligora-Dupriet A, Wydau-Dematteis S . The developing gut microbiota and its consequences for health. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2018; 9(6):590-597. DOI: 10.1017/S2040174418000119. View

3.
Zhang Q, Widmer G, Tzipori S . A pig model of the human gastrointestinal tract. Gut Microbes. 2013; 4(3):193-200. PMC: 3669164. DOI: 10.4161/gmic.23867. View

4.
Jiang H, Fang S, Yang H, Chen C . Identification of the relationship between the gut microbiome and feed efficiency in a commercial pig cohort. J Anim Sci. 2021; 99(3). PMC: 7947963. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skab045. View

5.
Mach N, Berri M, Estelle J, Levenez F, Lemonnier G, Denis C . Early-life establishment of the swine gut microbiome and impact on host phenotypes. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2015; 7(3):554-69. DOI: 10.1111/1758-2229.12285. View