» Articles » PMID: 39650131

The Physiological Responses of Critically Endangered Species Stapf (Primulaceae) to Different Light Intensities

Overview
Journal Photosynthetica
Date 2024 Dec 9
PMID 39650131
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To investigate the light intensity suitable for the growth of Stapf, morphology, photosynthetic parameters, and indicators of oxidative stress were analyzed under different light intensities. Compared to high-irradiance treatment, medium and low-irradiance treatments promoted plant growth and restricted transpiration. Compared to medium irradiance, plants under high and low irradiance exhibited significantly lower maximal photochemical efficiency, potential photochemical efficiency, and electron transport rate, but significantly higher malondialdehyde content. This indicated that both excessive light and severe shading inhibited photosynthetic activity and induced oxidative stress, which resulted in a significant decrease in net photosynthetic rate. can adapt to different light intensities, improving light harvesting and utilizing capacity under low irradiance by increasing Chl () content and reducing Chl / ratio, and adapting to high irradiance by enhancing heat dissipation and activity of peroxidase. showed the best performance in growth and photosynthesis under medium irradiance treatment.

References
1.
Zhang Y, Xia G, Ma K, Li G, Dai Y, Yan C . [Effects of shade on photosynthetic characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence of Ardisia violacea]. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2014; 25(7):1940-8. View

2.
Deng Y, Li C, Shao Q, Ye X, She J . Differential responses of double petal and multi petal jasmine to shading: I. Photosynthetic characteristics and chloroplast ultrastructure. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2012; 55:93-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.03.006. View

3.
Sharma P, Dubey R . Involvement of oxidative stress and role of antioxidative defense system in growing rice seedlings exposed to toxic concentrations of aluminum. Plant Cell Rep. 2007; 26(11):2027-38. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-007-0416-6. View

4.
Muller P, Li X, Niyogi K . Non-photochemical quenching. A response to excess light energy. Plant Physiol. 2001; 125(4):1558-66. PMC: 1539381. DOI: 10.1104/pp.125.4.1558. View

5.
Kitajima M, Butler W . Quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence and primary photochemistry in chloroplasts by dibromothymoquinone. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1975; 376(1):105-15. DOI: 10.1016/0005-2728(75)90209-1. View