» Articles » PMID: 39649689

Correlates of Self-Reported Executive Function Impairment Among Medicaid Beneficiaries With Type 2 Diabetes

Overview
Journal Diabetes Spectr
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2024 Dec 9
PMID 39649689
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: Executive function (EF) impairment is associated with poorer outcomes for individuals with type 2 diabetes. Previous research has identified risk factors for EF impairment, but many of these are also associated with type 2 diabetes. To address this issue, this study identified relevant variables from the literature and compared their association with EF in a sample of people with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: Adult members of a Medicaid health plan diagnosed with type 2 diabetes were enrolled in a social needs intervention trial. Using baseline data from the trial, bivariate and multivariable regression analyses examined associations between EF and demographic, health, and psychosocial factors.

Results: When controlling for other factors, we identified six significant correlates of EF impairment: age (β = 0.10), education (college vs. no college; β = -0.38), depression symptoms (β = 0.18), comorbidity burden (β = 0.21), diabetes-related distress (β = 0.14), and future time orientation (β = -0.13).

Conclusion: Our analysis identified several factors associated with greater EF impairment, which may interfere with diabetes self-management. Providers should consider these factors when prescribing treatments and determine whether additional resources or accommodations are warranted.

References
1.
Gershon R, Lai J, Bode R, Choi S, Moy C, Bleck T . Neuro-QOL: quality of life item banks for adults with neurological disorders: item development and calibrations based upon clinical and general population testing. Qual Life Res. 2011; 21(3):475-86. PMC: 3889669. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-011-9958-8. View

2.
Bayliss E, Ellis J, Steiner J . Seniors' self-reported multimorbidity captured biopsychosocial factors not incorporated into two other data-based morbidity measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008; 62(5):550-7.e1. PMC: 2743235. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.05.002. View

3.
Tatulashvili S, Fagherazzi G, Dow C, Cohen R, Fosse S, Bihan H . Socioeconomic inequalities and type 2 diabetes complications: A systematic review. Diabetes Metab. 2019; 46(2):89-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2019.11.001. View

4.
Paradela R, Ferreira N, Penteado Nucci M, Cabella B, Martino L, Torres L . Relation of a Socioeconomic Index with Cognitive Function and Neuroimaging in Hypertensive Individuals. J Alzheimers Dis. 2021; 82(2):815-826. DOI: 10.3233/JAD-210143. View

5.
Chew B, Vos R, Metzendorf M, Scholten R, Rutten G . Psychological interventions for diabetes-related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 9:CD011469. PMC: 6483710. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011469.pub2. View