Changes in Online Moral Discourse About Public Figures During #MeToo

Overview

Journal Affect Sci

Publisher Springer

Date 2024 Dec 9

PMID 39649464

Authors

Benjamin M Silver

Kevin N Ochsner

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

During the #MeToo movement, the perceived morality of public figures changed in light of sexual assault allegations against them. Here, we asked how these changes were influenced by the perceived severity of alleged actions and by how well-known and well-liked were the public figures. Perceived morality was assessed by measuring (im)moral language usage in 1.4 million tweets about 50 male public figures accused of sexual assault. Using natural language processing to analyze the tweets, we found that liking of public figures mitigated perceived immorality for less severe allegations, but had little effect on perceived immorality for more severe allegations. The persistence of negative perceptions 1 year later was related to liking and familiarity for the public figure, not allegation severity. These results suggest that in real-world contexts, we can forgive less harmful actions for people we like, but may not be able to if their actions are more harmful; over time, however, liking for others predicts lasting negative impressions of their moral misdeeds.

References

Brady W, McLoughlin K, Doan T, Crockett M . How social learning amplifies moral outrage expression in online social networks. Sci Adv. 2021; 7(33). PMC: 8363141. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abe5641. View

Cao J, Banaji M . The base rate principle and the fairness principle in social judgment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 113(27):7475-80. PMC: 4941486. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1524268113. View

Eberhardt J, Davies P, Purdie-Vaughns V, Johnson S . Looking deathworthy: perceived stereotypicality of Black defendants predicts capital-sentencing outcomes. Psychol Sci. 2006; 17(5):383-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01716.x. View

Burton J, Cruz N, Hahn U . Reconsidering evidence of moral contagion in online social networks. Nat Hum Behav. 2021; 5(12):1629-1635. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01133-5. View

Lai C, Skinner A, Cooley E, Murrar S, Brauer M, Devos T . Reducing implicit racial preferences: II. Intervention effectiveness across time. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016; 145(8):1001-16. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000179. View

Graham J, Haidt J, Nosek B . Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009; 96(5):1029-46. DOI: 10.1037/a0015141. View

Bhanji J, Beer J . Dissociable neural modulation underlying lasting first impressions, changing your mind for the better, and changing it for the worse. J Neurosci. 2013; 33(22):9337-44. PMC: 6618563. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5634-12.2013. View

Wagner D, Chavez R, Broom T . Decoding the neural representation of self and person knowledge with multivariate pattern analysis and data-driven approaches. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2018; 10(1):e1482. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1482. View

Gantman A, Van Bavel J . Moral Perception. Trends Cogn Sci. 2015; 19(11):631-633. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.004. View

10.

Kovacs G . Getting to Know Someone: Familiarity, Person Recognition, and Identification in the Human Brain. J Cogn Neurosci. 2020; 32(12):2205-2225. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01627. View

11.

Cone J, Flaharty K, Ferguson M . The Long-Term Effects of New Evidence on Implicit Impressions of Other People. Psychol Sci. 2021; 32(2):173-188. DOI: 10.1177/0956797620963559. View

12.

Siegel J, Mathys C, Rutledge R, Crockett M . Beliefs about bad people are volatile. Nat Hum Behav. 2019; 2(10):750-756. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-018-0425-1. View

13.

Mende-Siedlecki P . Changing our minds: the neural bases of dynamic impression updating. Curr Opin Psychol. 2018; 24:72-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.08.007. View

14.

Schone J, Parkinson B, Goldenberg A . Negativity Spreads More than Positivity on Twitter After Both Positive and Negative Political Situations. Affect Sci. 2022; 2(4):379-390. PMC: 9383030. DOI: 10.1007/s42761-021-00057-7. View

15.

Gannon T, Rose M, Ward T . A descriptive model of the offense process for female sexual offenders. Sex Abuse. 2008; 20(3):352-74. DOI: 10.1177/1079063208322495. View

16.

Metzler H, Rime B, Pellert M, Niederkrotenthaler T, Di Natale A, Garcia D . Collective emotions during the COVID-19 outbreak. Emotion. 2022; 23(3):844-858. DOI: 10.1037/emo0001111. View

17.

Mende-Siedlecki P, Todorov A . Neural dissociations between meaningful and mere inconsistency in impression updating. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016; 11(9):1489-500. PMC: 5015807. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsw058. View

18.

Park B, Young L . An association between biased impression updating and relationship facilitation: A behavioral and fMRI investigation. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2020; 87. PMC: 7453880. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103916. View

19.

Simchon A, Guntuku S, Simhon R, Ungar L, Hassin R, Gilead M . Political depression? A big-data, multimethod investigation of Americans' emotional response to the Trump presidency. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020; 149(11):2154-2168. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000767. View

20.

Crockett M . Moral outrage in the digital age. Nat Hum Behav. 2019; 1(11):769-771. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-017-0213-3. View