Accuracy and Reliability of the AO/OTA Classification for Tibial Shaft Fractures

Overview

Journal J Clin Orthop Trauma

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2024 Dec 6

PMID 39639941

Authors

Rasmus Stokholm

Peter Larsen

Jan Duedal Rolfing

Marie Arildsen

Christian Grundtvig Rasmussen

Rasmus Elsoe

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Available literature lacks information regarding the accuracy and reliability of the AO/OTA classification for tibial shaft fractures. This study aimed to assess the inter- and intra-observer agreement and accuracy of the AO/OTA 42 classification (4-signs) for adult patients with tibial shaft fractures.

Materials And Methods: The study design is an accuracy, inter- and intra-observer agreement study. Anterior posterior (AP) and lateral X-rays of the fracture were used in the examination. The raters comprised of two junior doctors and two orthopedic trauma consultants, who underwent patient scoring twice in a blinded and randomized set-up. A committee including two consultant orthopedic trauma surgeons, one consultant orthopedic radiologist, and one associate professor was established to represent the "gold standard." The 3- and 4-signs AO/OTA 42 classification was used for classification.

Results: A total of 101 patients were included. X-rays were available for all 101 patients. Based on the gold standard classification, AO/OTA 42-A1 (56 %) was the most common fracture type, followed by AO/OTA 42-A3 (14 %). The agreement at 4-signs, when comparing the four raters and the gold standard classification was between 75 % and 86 % (Choen's kappa 0.53 to 0.79). Choen's kappa coefficient at 4-sgns for intra-and inter-observer agreement was between 0.47 and 0.74 and 0.31 and 0.60, respectively.

Conclusion: This study showed substantial to moderate accuracy of the 4-signs AO/OTA 42- classification for tibial shaft fractures. Intra-observation agreements at 4-signs showed moderate to substantial agreement with and without available CT scans. Inter-observer agreements at 4-signs showed moderate to substantial agreement with only X-rays available. Inter-observer agreements for CT scan at 4-signs showed slight to moderate agreements.

References

Kristensen P, Rock N, Christensen H, Pedersen A . The Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry 13-Year Results from a Population-Based Cohort of Hip Fracture Patients. Clin Epidemiol. 2020; 12:9-21. PMC: 6959215. DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S231578. View

Laigle M, Rony L, Pinet R, Lancigu R, Steiger V, Hubert L . Intramedullary nailing for adult open tibial shaft fracture. An 85-case series. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019; 105(5):1021-1024. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.04.020. View

Gromov K, Brix M, Kallemose T, Troelsen A . Early results and future challenges of the Danish Fracture Database. Dan Med J. 2014; 61(6):A4851. View

Martin J, Marsh J, Bonar S, DeCoster T, FOUND E, Brandser E . Assessment of the AO/ASIF fracture classification for the distal tibia. J Orthop Trauma. 1997; 11(7):477-83. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199710000-00004. View

Beirer M, Kirchhoff C, Biberthaler P . Development of a German fracture register to assess current fracture care and improve treatment quality: A feasibility study. EFORT Open Rev. 2018; 2(12):474-477. PMC: 5765987. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160086. View

Marongiu G, Leinardi L, Congia S, Frigau L, Mola F, Capone A . Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems. J Orthop Traumatol. 2020; 21(1):4. PMC: 7067934. DOI: 10.1186/s10195-020-0543-1. View

Lichtenhahn P, Fernandez D, Schatzker J . [Analysis of the "user friendliness" of the AO classification of fractures]. Helv Chir Acta. 1992; 58(6):919-24. View

Vicenti G, Bizzoca D, Pascarella R, Delprete F, Chiodini F, Daghino W . Development of the Italian fractures registry (RIFra): A call for action to improve quality and safety. Injury. 2020; 54 Suppl 1:S58-S62. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.052. View

Nguyen M, Paull T, Miclau T, Marmor M . Usage of orthopaedic trauma registries among members of the International Orthopaedic Trauma Association: How are we doing?. OTA Int. 2022; 5(4):e224. PMC: 9782309. DOI: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000224. View

10.

Swiontkowski M, Agel J, McAndrew M, Burgess A, Mackenzie E . Outcome validation of the AO/OTA fracture classification system. J Orthop Trauma. 2001; 14(8):534-41. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200011000-00003. View

11.

Gardner M, Yacoubian S, Geller D, Suk M, Mintz D, Potter H . The incidence of soft tissue injury in operative tibial plateau fractures: a magnetic resonance imaging analysis of 103 patients. J Orthop Trauma. 2005; 19(2):79-84. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200502000-00002. View

12.

Larsen P, Elsoe R, Hansen S, Graven-Nielsen T, Laessoe U, Rasmussen S . Incidence and epidemiology of tibial shaft fractures. Injury. 2015; 46(4):746-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.12.027. View

13.

McHugh M . Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012; 22(3):276-82. PMC: 3900052. View

14.

Petrisor B, Lau J . Electrical bone stimulation: an overview and its use in high risk and Charcot foot and ankle reconstructions. Foot Ankle Clin. 2005; 10(4):609-20, vii-viii. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2005.06.003. View

15.

Audige L, Bhandari M, Kellam J . How reliable are reliability studies of fracture classifications? A systematic review of their methodologies. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004; 75(2):184-94. DOI: 10.1080/00016470412331294445. View

16.

Marsh J, Slongo T, Agel J, Broderick J, Creevey W, DeCoster T . Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma. 2008; 21(10 Suppl):S1-133. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200711101-00001. View

17.

Meling T, Harboe K, Enoksen C, Aarflot M, Arthursson A, Soreide K . How reliable and accurate is the AO/OTA comprehensive classification for adult long-bone fractures?. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012; 73(1):224-31. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31824cf0ab. View

18.

Wennergren D, Ekholm C, Sandelin A, Moller M . The Swedish fracture register: 103,000 fractures registered. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015; 16:338. PMC: 4636773. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-015-0795-8. View

19.

Meinberg E, Agel J, Roberts C, Karam M, Kellam J . Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma. 2017; 32 Suppl 1:S1-S170. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001063. View

20.

Wennergren D, Ekholm C, Sundfeldt M, Karlsson J, Bhandari M, Moller M . High reliability in classification of tibia fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register. Injury. 2015; 47(2):478-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.11.002. View