Treatment Decision for Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: Effects of Cone-beam Computed Tomography and Level of Surgeons' Experience

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2024 Dec 5

PMID 39637068

Authors

Emine Adali

Meltem Ozden Yuce

Gozde Isik

Elif Sener

Ali Mert

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of surgeons' experience and the benefit of using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, compared to the use of panoramic radiography (PAN) images, on their decisions with regard to mandibular third molar treatment modality. Panoramic radiographs and CBCTs from a total of 143 patients who had undergone impacted third molar surgery were randomly evaluated for treatment decision by 10 participants with differing clinical experience (5 novices and 5 experienced surgeons). The degree of agreement between the same type of participants was 'Substantial Agreement' (0.61-0.80) or 'Almost Perfect' (0.81-1.00). When the treatment modality decisions of the experienced and novice surgeons, using PAN and CBCT images, were compared, a statistically significant difference was found (p<0.01) between the variables. In 50 cases, experienced surgeons decided from CBCT images that total extraction was the best treatment method but opted for coronectomy when presented with PAN images of the same cases. In 164 cases novice surgeons decided on total extraction from CBCT images but chose coronectomy when presented with PAN images of the same cases. The results obtained from this study revealed that the degree of professional experience of the surgeon was a significant factor in determining the treatment decision. Moreover, the treatment choice of experienced surgeons was less affected by the change in imaging technique employed, when compared to novice surgeons.

References

Camargo I, Melo A, Fernandes A, Cunningham Jr L, Laureano Filho J, Van Sickels J . Decision making in third molar surgery: a survey of Brazilian oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Int Dent J. 2015; 65(4):169-77. PMC: 9376505. DOI: 10.1111/idj.12165. View

Kang F, Sah M, Fei G . Determining the risk relationship associated with inferior alveolar nerve injury following removal of mandibular third molar teeth: A systematic review. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 121(1):63-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas.2019.06.010. View

Suomalainen A, Venta I, Mattila M, Turtola L, Vehmas T, Peltola J . Reliability of CBCT and other radiographic methods in preoperative evaluation of lower third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010; 109(2):276-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.021. View

Knutsson K, Lysell L, Rohlin M . Dentists' decisions on prophylactic removal of mandibular third molars: a 10-year follow-up study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2001; 29(4):308-14. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2001.290411.x. View

Matzen L, Christensen J, Hintze H, Schou S, Wenzel A . Influence of cone beam CT on treatment plan before surgical intervention of mandibular third molars and impact of radiographic factors on deciding on coronectomy vs surgical removal. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012; 42(1):98870341. PMC: 5083118. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/98870341. View

Smith W . The relative risk of neurosensory deficit following removal of mandibular third molar teeth: the influence of radiography and surgical technique. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012; 115(1):18-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.03.017. View

Mukherjee S, Vikraman B, Sankar D, Veerabahu M . Evaluation of Outcome Following Coronectomy for the Management of Mandibular Third Molars in Close Proximity to Inferior Alveolar Nerve. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016; 10(8):ZC57-62. PMC: 5028523. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/20991.8273. View

Xu G, Yang C, Fan X, Yu C, Cai X, Wang Y . Anatomic relationship between impacted third mandibular molar and the mandibular canal as the risk factor of inferior alveolar nerve injury. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 51(8):e215-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.01.011. View

Knutsson K, Lysell L, Rohlin M . Postoperative status after partial removal of the mandibular third molar. Swed Dent J. 1989; 13(1-2):15-22. View

10.

Lindh C, Petersson A, Klinge B . Visualisation of the mandibular canal by different radiographic techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992; 3(2):90-7. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030207.x. View

11.

Sisk A, Hammer W, SHELTON D, Joy Jr E . Complications following removal of impacted third molars: the role of the experience of the surgeon. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986; 44(11):855-9. DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(86)90221-1. View

12.

Koong B, Pharoah M, Bulsara M, Tennant M . Methods of determining the relationship of the mandibular canal and third molars: a survey of Australian oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Aust Dent J. 2006; 51(1):64-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2006.tb00403.x. View

13.

Manor Y, Abir R, Manor A, Kaffe I . Are different imaging methods affecting the treatment decision of extractions of mandibular third molars?. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016; 46(1):20160233. PMC: 5595052. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20160233. View

14.

Umar G, Obisesan O, Bryant C, Rood J . Elimination of permanent injuries to the inferior alveolar nerve following surgical intervention of the "high risk" third molar. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 51(4):353-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.08.006. View

15.

Rood J, Shehab B . The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990; 28(1):20-5. DOI: 10.1016/0266-4356(90)90005-6. View

16.

Tay A, Zuniga J . Clinical characteristics of trigeminal nerve injury referrals to a university centre. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 36(10):922-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.03.012. View

17.

Jerjes W, Swinson B, Moles D, El-Maaytah M, Banu B, Upile T . Permanent sensory nerve impairment following third molar surgery: a prospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006; 102(4):e1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.01.016. View

18.

Anthony Pogrel M . Partial odontectomy. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2007; 19(1):85-91, vi-vii. DOI: 10.1016/j.coms.2006.11.006. View

19.

Matzen L, Berkhout E . Cone beam CT imaging of the mandibular third molar: a position paper prepared by the European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology (EADMFR). Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019; 48(5):20190039. PMC: 6747425. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20190039. View