» Articles » PMID: 39630191

Association Between Frailty and Adverse Outcomes After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Eur Geriatr Med
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2024 Dec 4
PMID 39630191
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To synthesize evidence, using data from published studies, on the association of frailty with the outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Methods: The systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases was done to identify observational studies (cohort/case-control/cross-sectional) that used an objective method for frailty assessment and had presented adjusted effect sizes. STATA version 15.0 was used to conduct analysis, which was based on random effects model.

Results: Fifteen studies were included. Frailty was found to be associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio (OR) 6.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.48, 8.85). The effect of frailty on the response to CRT was not statistically significant (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.19, 1.59). The pooled effect size indicated that frailty was associated with somewhat bigger but not statistically significant increase in the risk of complications (OR 1.70, 95% CI 0.93, 3.12). The risks of mortality and decompensated heart failure on long-term follow up were higher in frail patients (Hazard ratio (HR) 1.75, 95% CI 1.40, 2.17 and HR 3.03, 95% CI 1.33, 6.90, respectively) compared to patients without frailty. The risk of readmission was higher in frail patients, however, it did not achieve statistical significance (HR 2.63, 95% CI 0.89, 7.75).

Conclusion: Frail CRT patients could be at higher risks of mortality, decompensated heart failure, and may have potentially higher rates of complications. Integrating frailty assessment into pre-CRT evaluation and customizing interventions for frail patients might be an essential steps towards enhancing outcomes in this population.

Citing Articles

Moving from just measuring, to acting on frailty in specialties outside geriatrics.

Houghton J Eur Geriatr Med. 2025; 16(1):179-181.

PMID: 39836358 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-025-01154-7.

References
1.
Savelieva I, Fumagalli S, Kenny R, Anker S, Benetos A, Boriani G . EHRA expert consensus document on the management of arrhythmias in frailty syndrome, endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), Latin America Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), and Cardiac Arrhythmia Society of.... Europace. 2023; 25(4):1249-1276. PMC: 10105859. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac123. View

2.
Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View

3.
Clegg A, Hassan-Smith Z . Frailty and the endocrine system. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018; 6(9):743-752. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30110-4. View

4.
Tsukakoshi D, Yamamoto S, Takeda S, Furuhashi K, Sato M . Clinical Perspectives on Cardiac Rehabilitation After Heart Failure in Elderly Patients with Frailty: A Narrative Review. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2022; 18:1009-1028. PMC: 9620837. DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S350748. View

5.
Ishii R, Enomoto Y, Nakamura K, Noro M, Hara H, Sugi K . Impact of Preprocedural Frailty Status in Elderly Transvenous Pacemaker Recipients. Int Heart J. 2023; 64(6):1025-1031. DOI: 10.1536/ihj.23-060. View