» Articles » PMID: 39630075

PFAS-Free Energy Storage: Investigating Alternatives for Lithium-Ion Batteries

Overview
Date 2024 Dec 4
PMID 39630075
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The class-wide restriction proposal on perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the European Union is expected to affect a wide range of commercial sectors, including the lithium-ion battery (LIB) industry, where both polymeric and low molecular weight PFAS are used. The PFAS restriction dossiers currently state that there is weak evidence for viable alternatives to the use of PFAS in LIBs. In this Perspective, we summarize both the peer-reviewed literature and expert opinions from academia and industry to verify the legitimacy of the claims surrounding the lack of alternatives. Our assessment is limited to the electrodes and electrolyte, which account for the most critical uses of PFAS in LIB cells. Companies that already offer or are developing PFAS-free electrode and electrolyte materials were identified. There are also indications that PFAS-free electrolytes are in development by at least one other company, but there is no information regarding the alternative chemistries being proposed. Our review suggests that it is technically feasible to make PFAS-free batteries for battery applications, but PFAS-free solutions are not currently well-established on the market. Successful substitution of PFAS will require an appropriate balance among battery performance, the environmental effects associated with hazardous materials and chemicals, and economic considerations.

References
1.
Zahn D, Fromel T, Knepper T . Halogenated methanesulfonic acids: A new class of organic micropollutants in the water cycle. Water Res. 2016; 101:292-299. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.05.082. View

2.
Mao G, Luo J, Zhou Q, Xiao F, Tang R, Li J . Improved cycling stability of high nickel cathode material for lithium ion battery through Al- and Ti-based dual modification. Nanoscale. 2021; 13(44):18741-18753. DOI: 10.1039/d1nr06005h. View

3.
Jiao E, Larsson P, Wang Q, Zhu Z, Yin D, Karrman A . Further Insight into Extractable (Organo)fluorine Mass Balance Analysis of Tap Water from Shanghai, China. Environ Sci Technol. 2023; 57(38):14330-14339. PMC: 10537424. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c02718. View

4.
Dobryden I, Montanari C, Bhattacharjya D, Aydin J, Ahniyaz A . Bio-Based Binder Development for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Materials (Basel). 2023; 16(16). PMC: 10456484. DOI: 10.3390/ma16165553. View

5.
Hernandez G, Naylor A, Chien Y, Brandell D, Mindemark J, Edstrom K . Elimination of Fluorination: The Influence of Fluorine-Free Electrolytes on the Performance of LiNiMnCoO/Silicon-Graphite Li-Ion Battery Cells. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2020; 8(27):10041-10052. PMC: 7493211. DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c01733. View