» Articles » PMID: 39627743

Students' Perception and Self-efficacy in Blended Learning of Medical Nutrition Course: a Mixed-method Research

Overview
Journal BMC Med Educ
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2024 Dec 3
PMID 39627743
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The blended teaching mode, which combines online and offline learning, has gained significant traction in higher education. This study aims to explore the impact of blended learning on students' academic performance, engagement, and self-efficacy in a medical nutrition course.

Methods: A mixed-method research design was employed, involving 110 undergraduate students enrolled in a blended learning medical nutrition course and a control group of 93 students from a traditional learning environment. Data collection included academic performance assessments, semi-structured interviews, and an anonymous questionnaire. Quantitative data were analyzed using t-tests and chi-square tests, while qualitative data were subjected to thematic analysis.

Results: Students in the blended learning group demonstrated significantly higher self-efficacy, particularly in organizing their study plans, participating in interactive learning activities, and applying course knowledge. Academic performance was notably better in collaborative assessments, such as group discussions and exploratory projects, in the blended learning group compared to the control group. Qualitative analysis revealed that students appreciated the flexibility and engagement offered by the blended learning model, although they also faced challenges related to self-discipline and the learning environment.

Conclusions: The blended learning approach enhances student engagement, self-efficacy, and collaborative skills, particularly in group-based assessments. While students benefit from the flexibility and richness of learning resources, challenges related to self-discipline and learning environments need to be addressed to optimize the effectiveness of blended learning.

References
1.
Hobson R . Blended learning in teaching orthodontics. Br Dent J. 2020; 228(12):904-905. DOI: 10.1038/s41415-020-1805-2. View

2.
Bains M, Reynolds P, McDonald F, Sherriff M . Effectiveness and acceptability of face-to-face, blended and e-learning: a randomised trial of orthodontic undergraduates. Eur J Dent Educ. 2011; 15(2):110-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2010.00651.x. View

3.
Vavasseur A, Muscari F, Meyrignac O, Nodot M, Dedouit F, Revel-Mouroz P . Blended learning of radiology improves medical students' performance, satisfaction, and engagement. Insights Imaging. 2020; 11(1):61. PMC: 7188751. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-020-00865-8. View

4.
Heilporn G, Lakhal S, Belisle M . An examination of teachers' strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2021; 18(1):25. PMC: 8591686. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3. View

5.
Cole 3rd W, Perez-Chaumont A, Miskimin C, Mulcahey M . Social Media and Its Use in Orthopaedic Surgery Resident Education and Training. JBJS Rev. 2021; 9(11). DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.21.00083. View