» Articles » PMID: 39627636

Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes of Primary Tumor Resection in Patients with Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Results from a Single-Center Series Over a 15-Year Period

Overview
Journal Ann Surg Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Dec 3
PMID 39627636
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The role of prophylactic primary tumor resection (PTR) in patients with small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NETs) and unresectable liver metastases is a matter of debate.

Objective: We aimed to evaluate outcomes in patients with SI-NETs who underwent PTR, according to the presence of metastasis and symptoms from primary.

Material And Methods: Data from patients who underwent PTR for SI-NETs from a single referral center (2007-2023) were prospectively collected. Patients were divided into three groups: non-metastatic (M0) and metastatic with primary tumor-related symptoms (MS) or metastatic asymptomatic (MA). Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were generated and compared by group. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the significance of risk factors.

Results: Of 147 patients, 53 were M0, 23 were MS, and 71 were MA. Median follow-up was 26 months. The 5- and 10-year OS estimates were 100% and 100% in M0 patients, 82 and 21% in MS patients, and 89 and 80% in MA patients, respectively (p < 0.001). Median EFS was 91 months overall and 43,126 months and not reached for the MS, MA, and M0 groups, respectively (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, MS (hazard ratio [HR] 3.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.71-9.52), functioning tumors (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.03-3.81), and G2 grade (HR 3.20, 95% CI 1.64-6.85) were associated with a shorter EFS.

Conclusions: In this large retrospective series, the MS group had a significantly worse OS and EFS compared with M0 and MA. This finding suggests that prophylactic PTR might benefit SI-NET patients with unresectable liver metastases, as symptom development could impair long-term prognosis after surgery.

Citing Articles

ASO Author Reflections: Primary Tumor Resection in Metastatic Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Step Toward Standardized Management?.

Danieli M, Bertani E Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 32(3):2185-2186.

PMID: 39722085 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16718-3.

References
1.
Dasari A, Shen C, Halperin D, Zhao B, Zhou S, Xu Y . Trends in the Incidence, Prevalence, and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors in the United States. JAMA Oncol. 2017; 3(10):1335-1342. PMC: 5824320. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0589. View

2.
Bilimoria K, Bentrem D, Wayne J, Ko C, Bennett C, Talamonti M . Small bowel cancer in the United States: changes in epidemiology, treatment, and survival over the last 20 years. Ann Surg. 2008; 249(1):63-71. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818e4641. View

3.
Ter-Minassian M, Chan J, Hooshmand S, Brais L, Daskalova A, Heafield R . Clinical presentation, recurrence, and survival in patients with neuroendocrine tumors: results from a prospective institutional database. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2013; 20(2):187-96. PMC: 3739696. DOI: 10.1530/ERC-12-0340. View

4.
Landerholm K, Falkmer S, Jarhult J . Epidemiology of small bowel carcinoids in a defined population. World J Surg. 2010; 34(7):1500-5. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0519-z. View

5.
Gangi A, Howe J . The Landmark Series: Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020; 27(9):3270-3280. PMC: 7415723. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08787-x. View