» Articles » PMID: 39624625

Efficacy and Safety of Angiogenesis Inhibitors Combined with Poly ADP Ribose Polymerase Inhibitors in the Maintenance Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer: a Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Front Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Dec 3
PMID 39624625
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of angiogenesis inhibitors (Ais) combined with poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) in the maintenance treatment of advanced ovarian cancer (OC).

Materials And Methods: A systematic search was conducted in four databases (Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane) for articles published from the inception of the databases until January 15, 2024. The focus of the search was on articles investigating the combination of Ais with PARPi in the maintenance treatment of ovarian cancer. Meta-analyses were conducted to assess the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the risk of Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (Grade≥ 3 AEs).

Results: Totally nine studies were included for meta-analysis. The overall pooled ORR of Ais combined with PARPi was 57% (95% CI, 35% to 77%). Subgroup analyses showed that the ORR for patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer, platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer and newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer were 30% (95% CI, 12% to 52%), 70% (95% CI, 61% to 78%) and 59% (95% CI, 55% to 63%), respectively. The median PFS was 5.8 months (95% CI, 5.3 to 7.1), 12.4 months (95% CI, 10.6 to 13.2) and 22.4 months (95% CI, 21.5 to 24.2), respectively. The median OS was 15.5 months (95% CI, 12.3 to 24.8), 40.8 months (95% CI, 33.4 to 45.2) and 56.3 months (95% CI, 49.0 to 62.0), respectively. The rate Grade≥ 3 TRAEs rate was found to be 0.22 (95% CI, 0.13 to 0.33).

Conclusions: Our results confirmed that PARPi plus Ais was a feasible and safe option for the maintenance treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. The combination therapy should be recommended as the first-line maintenance treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. PARPi plus Ais yielded more favorable oncological prognosis for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, compared to patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer.

Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024543590, identifier CRD42024543590.

References
1.
Colombo N, Tomao F, Benedetti Panici P, Nicoletto M, Tognon G, Bologna A . Randomized phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel vs. cediranib-olaparib (continuous or intermittent schedule) in platinum-resistant high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2022; 164(3):505-513. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.01.015. View

2.
Lee Y, Tan Y, Oon C . Molecular targeted therapy: Treating cancer with specificity. Eur J Pharmacol. 2018; 834:188-196. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2018.07.034. View

3.
Zardavas D, Tryfonidis K, Goulioti T, Piccart M . Targeted adjuvant therapy in breast cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2016; 16(12):1263-1275. DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2016.1247698. View

4.
Javed Ansari M, Bokov D, Markov A, Turki Jalil A, Shalaby M, Suksatan W . Cancer combination therapies by angiogenesis inhibitors; a comprehensive review. Cell Commun Signal. 2022; 20(1):49. PMC: 8991477. DOI: 10.1186/s12964-022-00838-y. View

5.
Liu J, Brady M, Matulonis U, Miller A, Kohn E, Swisher E . Olaparib With or Without Cediranib Versus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Recurrent Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian Cancer (NRG-GY004): A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2022; 40(19):2138-2147. PMC: 9242406. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.21.02011. View