Complications in Pericardiocentesis: Right Ventricular Perforation in a 75-Year-Old Patient with Lymphoma

Overview

Journal Am J Case Rep

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2024 Dec 3

PMID 39623706

Authors

Jinguo Xu

Shenglin Ge

Chengxin Zhang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Pericardiocentesis is a commonly used procedure to remove or sample pericardial effusion, and complications of this procedure are rare. This report describes a 75-year-old man with lymphoma and right ventricular perforation during pericardiocentesis for pericardial effusion. CASE REPORT A 75-year-old male patient with diffuse large B cell lymphoma was admitted with concerns of refractory chest tightness and breath shortness after physical exercise. Images from echocardiography showed massive pericardial effusion. After a comprehensive clinical assessment, pericardiocentesis was selected as the corresponding strategy, with the aim to improve the symptom of pericardial compression. However, during the procedure, it was found that the catheter was not placed into the expected location, and the right ventricle was damaged by inappropriate puncture, which led to hemopericardium. Computed tomography showed a high-density 2-mm suspected foreign body penetrating from the pericardial cavity, right ventricle to pulmonary main artery. At the same time, echocardiography showed that cardiac compression was more severe from the progressive effusion and continuous clot formation, which could lead to tamponade or even sudden cardiac arrest. Therefore, this patient immediately underwent emergent exploratory thoracotomy to drain the hemopericardium and remove the misplaced catheter, as well as to repair the damaged right ventricle. CONCLUSIONS Pericardiocentesis has risks due to the invasiveness of the procedure; hence, it is important to conduct complete and comprehensive assessments and preparations before the procedure. Once related complications are found, earlier and effective intervention, including emergent surgery, should be necessary.

References

Besnard A, Raoux F, Khelil N, Monin J, Saal J, Veugeois A . Current Management of Symptomatic Pericardial Effusions in Cancer Patients. JACC CardioOncol. 2021; 1(1):137-140. PMC: 8352300. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2019.07.001. View

Ahmed T, Mouhayar E, Song J, Koutroumpakis E, Palaskas N, Yusuf S . Predictors of Recurrence and Survival in Cancer Patients With Pericardial Effusion Requiring Pericardiocentesis. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9:916325. PMC: 9192944. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.916325. View

LaValley C, Devitt K, Conant J . Discordant high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL6 rearrangements presenting as a pericardial effusion. Int J Lab Hematol. 2021; 44(1):34-35. DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.13709. View

Pennacchioni A, Nanni G, Sgura F, Imberti J, Monopoli D, Rossi R . Percutaneous pericardiocentesis for pericardial effusion: predictors of mortality and outcomes. Intern Emerg Med. 2021; 16(7):1771-1777. PMC: 7898017. DOI: 10.1007/s11739-021-02642-x. View

Bafna K, Kalra-Lall A, Gurajala R, Karuppasamy K . Computed Tomography-Guided Pericardiocentesis: A Practical Guide. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023; 25(11):1433-1441. DOI: 10.1007/s11886-023-01965-9. View

Giudicatti L, Cirillo M, King B . Pericardial effusion as first presentation of disseminated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. BMJ Case Rep. 2018; 2018. PMC: 6194417. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2018-225926. View

Zhang L, Zhang X, Liu Z, Liu Y, Guo C, Shao H . High frequency ultrasound-guided pericardiocentesis performed in the sitting position: A novel apical approach. Clin Cardiol. 2021; 44(8):1106-1112. PMC: 8364732. DOI: 10.1002/clc.23657. View

Luis S, Kane G, Luis C, Oh J, Sinak L . Overview of Optimal Techniques for Pericardiocentesis in Contemporary Practice. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2020; 22(8):60. DOI: 10.1007/s11886-020-01324-y. View

Khashper A, Shelef I, Taragin B, Smolikov A . Therapeutic Computed Tomography-Guided Pericardiocentesis: Lessons Learned Based on a 7-Year Single-Center Experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2021; 45(4):643-648. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001190. View

10.

Flint N, Siegel R . Echo-Guided Pericardiocentesis: When and How Should It Be Performed?. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2020; 22(8):71. DOI: 10.1007/s11886-020-01320-2. View

11.

Alerhand S, Adrian R, Long B, Avila J . Pericardial tamponade: A comprehensive emergency medicine and echocardiography review. Am J Emerg Med. 2022; 58:159-174. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.05.001. View

12.

Kanda D, Takumi T, Sonoda T, Arikawa R, Anzaki K, Sasaki Y . Coronary artery perforation secondary to lifesaving pericardiocentesis for cardiac tamponade: a case report. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021; 21(1):55. PMC: 7845111. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-021-01875-0. View

13.

Sinnaeve P, Adriaenssens T . A contemporary look at pericardiocentesis. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2018; 29(7):375-383. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2018.10.016. View

14.

Oida T, Mimatsu K, Kano H, Kawasaki A, Kuboi Y, Fukino N . Pericardiocentesis with cisplatin for malignant pericardial effusion and tamponade. World J Gastroenterol. 2010; 16(6):740-4. PMC: 2817063. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i6.740. View

15.

Sogaard K, Farkas D, Ehrenstein V, Bhaskaran K, Botker H, Sorensen H . Pericarditis as a Marker of Occult Cancer and a Prognostic Factor for Cancer Mortality. Circulation. 2017; 136(11):996-1006. PMC: 5657468. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024041. View

16.

Gluer R, Murdoch D, Haqqani H, Scalia G, Walters D . Pericardiocentesis – How to do it. Heart Lung Circ. 2015; 24(6):621-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2014.11.009. View