Preoperative Embolization of Brain Tumors Using a Provocative Test: Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Embolization of Test-Positive Vessels

Overview

Journal Cureus

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2024 Nov 29

PMID 39610567

Authors

Takao Hashimoto

Hirofumi Okada

Kyosuke Matsunaga

Yusuke Arai

Muneaki Kikuno

Hiroki Sakamoto

Michihiro Kohno

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: The embolization of vessels potentially involved in the vasa nervorum during brain tumor embolization is often a non-aggressive procedure. In this study, we aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of embolization of vessels with positive provocative test results.

Methods: Embosphere (Merit Medical Systems, South Jordan, Utah, USA) was the embolization material of choice. A provocative test was performed using 30 mg of 1% lidocaine, with a positive result if neurological symptoms appeared. A size of 500-700 µm was used for positive results and 300-500 µm for negative results. Embolization was performed five to seven days before resection, and contrast-enhanced MRI was performed three to five days after embolization to assess the embolic status.

Results: Provocative tests were performed on 61 vessels from 55 patients. A total of 36 vessels (59.0%) were positive, and 25 vessels were negative. The petrosal branch of the middle meningeal artery and the neuro-meningeal branch of the ascending pharyngeal artery showed particularly high positivity rates (91.7% and 76.5%, respectively). Three patients (8.3%) out of the 36 who underwent embolization of the positive vessels had neurological symptoms after embolization; two had symptoms similar to those observed in the provocative test, and one had different symptoms. All symptoms were mild and transient. The postoperative contrast-enhanced MRI showed that the enhancing effect was attenuated in 18 of the 30 patients (60%) with provocative test-positive vessels.

Conclusion: Embolization of provocative test-positive vessels can be performed safely and effectively with a larger Embosphere (500-700 μm).

References

Yoon Y, Ahn J, Chang J, Cho J, Suh S, Lee B . Pre-operative embolisation of internal carotid artery branches and pial vessels in hypervascular brain tumours. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008; 150(5):447-52. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-008-1513-1. View

Marinkovic S, Gibo H . The neurovascular relationships and the blood supply of the oculomotor nerve: the microsurgical anatomy of its cisternal segment. Surg Neurol. 1994; 42(6):505-16. DOI: 10.1016/0090-3019(94)90081-7. View

Rosen C, Ammerman J, Sekhar L, Bank W . Outcome analysis of preoperative embolization in cranial base surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2002; 144(11):1157-64. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-002-0965-y. View

Ozanne A, Pereira V, Krings T, Toulgoat F, Lasjaunias P . Arterial vascularization of the cranial nerves. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2008; 18(2):431-9, xii. DOI: 10.1016/j.nic.2007.12.010. View

LAPRESLE J, Lasjaunias P . Cranial nerve ischaemic arterial syndromes. A review. Brain. 1986; 109 ( Pt 1):207-16. DOI: 10.1093/brain/109.1.207. View

Shah A, Choudhri O, Jung H, Li G . Preoperative endovascular embolization of meningiomas: update on therapeutic options. Neurosurg Focus. 2015; 38(3):E7. DOI: 10.3171/2014.12.FOCUS14728. View

Carli D, Sluzewski M, Beute G, van Rooij W . Complications of particle embolization of meningiomas: frequency, risk factors, and outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009; 31(1):152-4. PMC: 7964095. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1754. View

Shah A, Patel N, Raper D, Bregy A, Ashour R, Elhammady M . The role of preoperative embolization for intracranial meningiomas. J Neurosurg. 2013; 119(2):364-72. DOI: 10.3171/2013.3.JNS121328. View

Singla A, Deshaies E, Melnyk V, Toshkezi G, Swarnkar A, Choi H . Controversies in the role of preoperative embolization in meningioma management. Neurosurg Focus. 2013; 35(6):E17. DOI: 10.3171/2013.9.FOCUS13351. View

10.

Krisht A, Barnett D, Barrow D, Bonner G . The blood supply of the intracavernous cranial nerves: an anatomic study. Neurosurgery. 1994; 34(2):275-9;discussion 279. DOI: 10.1227/00006123-199402000-00011. View

11.

Adams W . The blood supply of nerves: I. Historical review. J Anat. 1942; 76(Pt 4):323-41. PMC: 1252671. View

12.

Okada H, Hashimoto T, Tanaka Y, Sakamoto H, Kohno M . Embolization of Skull Base Meningiomas with Embosphere Microspheres: Factors Predicting Treatment Response and Evaluation of Complications. World Neurosurg. 2022; 162:e178-e186. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.02.118. View

13.

Bendszus M, Klein R, Burger R, Warmuth-Metz M, Hofmann E, Solymosi L . Efficacy of trisacryl gelatin microspheres versus polyvinyl alcohol particles in the preoperative embolization of meningiomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000; 21(2):255-61. PMC: 7975329. View

14.

Geibprasert S, Pongpech S, Armstrong D, Krings T . Dangerous extracranial-intracranial anastomoses and supply to the cranial nerves: vessels the neurointerventionalist needs to know. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009; 30(8):1459-68. PMC: 7051597. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1500. View

15.

SERBINENKO F, Lysachev A, Arustamian S . [Main anastomoses of external carotid artery branches with the beds of the internal carotid and the vertebral artery and a role of pharmacological tests in the determination of their functional value at tumor embolization]. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 2003; (3):15-8. View

16.

Nguyen H, Janich K, Doan N, Patel M, Li L, Mueller W . Extent of T1+C Intensity Is a Predictor of Blood Loss in Resection of Meningioma. World Neurosurg. 2017; 101:69-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.01.098. View

17.

Kai Y, Hamada J, Morioka M, Yano S, Nakamura H, Makino K . Preoperative cellulose porous beads for therapeutic embolization of meningioma: provocation test and technical considerations. Neuroradiology. 2007; 49(5):437-43. DOI: 10.1007/s00234-007-0218-0. View

18.

Arai S, Shimizu K, Yamochi T, Mizutani T, Okumura H, Nakajo T . Preoperative Embolization of Meningiomas: Differences in Surgical Operability and Histopathologic Changes Between Embosphere and N-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate. World Neurosurg. 2017; 111:e113-e119. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.12.003. View

19.

Hishikawa T, Sugiu K, Hiramatsu M, Haruma J, Tokunaga K, Date I . Nationwide survey of the nature and risk factors of complications in embolization of meningiomas and other intracranial tumors: Japanese Registry of NeuroEndovascular Therapy 2 (JR-NET2). Neuroradiology. 2013; 56(2):139-44. DOI: 10.1007/s00234-013-1300-4. View

20.

Sugiu K, Hishikawa T, Murai S, Takahashi Y, Kidani N, Nishihiro S . Treatment Outcome of Intracranial Tumor Embolization in Japan: Japanese Registry of NeuroEndovascular Therapy 3 (JR-NET3). Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2019; 59(2):41-47. PMC: 6375818. DOI: 10.2176/nmc.st.2018-0220. View