» Articles » PMID: 39609817

Effect of Different Obturation Techniques on Treatment Results in Single-visit Non-surgical Endodontic Retreatment: Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

Overview
Journal BMC Oral Health
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2024 Nov 28
PMID 39609817
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Evaluating the effect of different obturation techniques on postoperative pain level and radiographic healing on non-surgical endodontic retreatment (NSER) applied in a single visit in teeth with a single root canal and apical periodontitis (AP).

Materials And Methods: Sixty-three teeth from 50 systemically healthy patients (mean age 34.19 ± 9.75 years; 27 women, 23 men) were included in the study. Residual root canal filling materials were removed. All teeth were randomly divided into three groups according to the obturation technique: cold lateral compaction (CLC), continuous wave compaction (CWC), and thermoplasticized gutta-core (TGC). Pain status was evaluated using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NRS) in all cases. Periapical index (PAI) scores were recorded in preoperative and postoperative 6-month on the periapical radiographs. Data were analyzed as statistically (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). The significance level was determined as p < 0.05.

Results: It was found that more postoperative pain occurred in the 3rd-hour interval after CLC and CWC compared to the 7th-day interval (p < 0.05). There was no difference in postoperative pain between obturation techniques in all evaluated time intervals (p > 0.05). There was no difference in the PAI scores recorded at six months between obturation techniques for all periods (p > 0.05). Similar radiographic improvement was observed in all obturation techniques at 6-months (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: CLC, CWC, and TGC root canal obturation techniques were found to have similar efficacy after NSER in a single visit in teeth with AP at six months.

Trial Registration: The research was retrospectively registered on the website www.

Clinicaltrials: gov with the registration number NCT06226740 on 26/01/2024.

References
1.
Burns L, Visbal L, Kohli M, Karabucak B, Setzer F . Long-term Evaluation of Treatment Planning Decisions for Nonhealing Endodontic Cases by Different Groups of Practitioners. J Endod. 2017; 44(2):226-232. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.09.004. View

2.
Tosun S, Karataslioglu E, Tulgar M, Derindag G . Retrospective fractal analyses of one-year follow-up data obtained after single-visit nonsurgical endodontic retreatment on periapical radiographs. Clin Oral Investig. 2021; 25(11):6465-6472. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04079-0. View

3.
Torabinejad M, Corr R, Handysides R, Shabahang S . Outcomes of nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic surgery: a systematic review. J Endod. 2009; 35(7):930-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.023. View

4.
Delai D, Jardine A, Mestieri L, Boijink D, Fontanella V, Grecca F . Efficacy of a thermally treated single file compared with rotary systems in endodontic retreatment of curved canals: a micro-CT study. Clin Oral Investig. 2018; 23(4):1837-1844. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2624-6. View

5.
Estrela C, Bueno M, Azevedo B, Azevedo J, Pecora J . A new periapical index based on cone beam computed tomography. J Endod. 2008; 34(11):1325-1331. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.08.013. View