» Articles » PMID: 39609743

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography Guidance Avoids US-CT/MR Fusion Error for Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Overview
Journal BMC Med Imaging
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Radiology
Date 2024 Nov 28
PMID 39609743
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This study evaluated the impact of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) combined with CT or MRI fusion imaging on percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) inconspicuous on conventional ultrasonography (US).

Methods: Patients were categorized into US-inconspicuous (USI) and US-conspicuous (USC) groups based on US imaging. The parameters of viable HCCs ⎯ including diameter, location, and RFA efficacy ⎯ were compared between USI and USC groups. Moreover, the breathing fusion imaging errors were measured. The differences in technical success, technical efficacy, local tumor progression, new tumor occurrence, and overall survival rate between USI and USC groups were analyzed.

Results: Sixty-five patients with 106 lesions were included. CEUS showed high consistency with CT/MRI but revealed larger diameters (p < 0.001) and more feeding arteries (p = 0.019) than CT/MRI. Breathing fusion imaging errors averaged 17 ± 4 mm, significantly affecting lesions in segments II, III, V, and VI (p < 0.001). The USI group had more lesions ablated per patient in a single RFA procedure (p = 0.001) than the USC group. No significant differences were observed in technical success rate, technical efficacy rate, local tumor progression rate, and overall survival rate between the two groups.

Conclusions: CEUS combined with fusion imaging provides detailed information on viable HCCs and their feeding arteries. CEUS-guided RFA avoids fusion imaging errors and achieves comparable efficacy in both US-conspicuous and US-inconspicuous HCCs.

References
1.
Lee J, Yan K, Lee S, Yang W, Chen M . Focal Liver Lesions: Real-time 3-Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Compared With 2-Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Ultrasound Med. 2017; 36(10):2015-2026. DOI: 10.1002/jum.14268. View

2.
Xie D, Ren Z, Zhou J, Fan J, Gao Q . 2019 Chinese clinical guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: updates and insights. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2020; 9(4):452-463. PMC: 7423548. DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-20-480. View

3.
Shao Y, Wang S, Lin S . Management consensus guideline for hepatocellular carcinoma: 2020 update on surveillance, diagnosis, and systemic treatment by the Taiwan Liver Cancer Association and the Gastroenterological Society of Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2020; 120(4):1051-1060. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2020.10.031. View

4.
Zhang Z, Lee J, Yang W, Yan K, Wu W, Wang Y . Percutaneous ablation of the tumor feeding artery for hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma before tumor ablation. Int J Hyperthermia. 2018; 35(1):133-139. DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2018.1484525. View

5.
Lee C, Chen W, Lin C, Teng W, Lin S, Chiu C . Radiofrequency ablation assisted by real-time virtual sonography for hepatocellular carcinoma inconspicuous under sonography and high-risk locations. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2015; 31(8):413-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.kjms.2015.06.002. View