» Articles » PMID: 39609375

The Macroevolutionary Dynamics of Pharyngognathy in Fishes Fail to Support the Key Innovation Hypothesis

Overview
Journal Nat Commun
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Nov 28
PMID 39609375
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Key innovations, traits that provide species access to novel niches, are thought to be a major generator of biodiversity. One commonly cited example of key innovation is pharyngognathy, a set of modifications to the pharyngeal jaws found in some highly species-rich fish clades such as cichlids and wrasses. Here, using comparative phylogenomics and phylogenetic comparative methods, we investigate the genomic basis of pharyngognathy and the impact of this innovation on diversification. Whole genomes resolve the relationships of fish clades with this innovation and their close relatives, but high levels of topological discordance suggest the innovation may have evolved fewer times than previously thought. Closer examination of the topology of noncoding elements accelerated in clades with the pharyngognathy innovation reveals hidden patterns of shared ancestry across putatively independent transitions to pharyngognathy. When our updated phylogenomic relationships are used alongside large-scale phylogenetic and ecological datasets, we find no evidence pharyngognathy consistently modifies the macroevolutionary landscape of trophic ecology nor does it increase diversification. Our results highlight the necessity of incorporating genomic information in studies of key innovation.

Citing Articles

Evolutionary flexibility to gain or lose tooth complexity sparks fish diversification.

Ngoepe N Nature. 2025; .

PMID: 40011646 DOI: 10.1038/d41586-025-00541-1.

References
1.
Takahashi T, Moreno E . A RAD-based phylogenetics for Orestias fishes from Lake Titicaca. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2015; 93:307-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.08.012. View

2.
Rodgers R, Roach J, Reid N, Whitehead A, Duvernell D . Phylogenomic analysis of Fundulidae (Teleostei: Cyprinodotiformes) using RNA-sequencing data. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2018; 121:150-157. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2017.12.030. View

3.
Fukushima K, Pollock D . Detecting macroevolutionary genotype-phenotype associations using error-corrected rates of protein convergence. Nat Ecol Evol. 2023; 7(1):155-170. PMC: 9834058. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-022-01932-7. View

4.
Shimeld S, Holland P . Vertebrate innovations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97(9):4449-52. PMC: 34320. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.9.4449. View

5.
Rabosky D . Automatic detection of key innovations, rate shifts, and diversity-dependence on phylogenetic trees. PLoS One. 2014; 9(2):e89543. PMC: 3935878. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089543. View