» Articles » PMID: 39607677

Strengthening the Governance of Food Systems for Nutrition in Africa: a Political Economy Analysis of Food Policy in South Africa and Ghana

Overview
Date 2024 Nov 28
PMID 39607677
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To examine underlying political economy factors that enable or impede the integration of nutrition considerations into food system governance.

Design: Comparative political economy analysis of data collected through (1) value chain analyses of selected healthy and unhealthy commodities and (2) food system policy analyses, using a theoretical framework focused on power, politics, interests and ideas.

Setting: Ghana and South Africa.

Participants: Value chain actors relevant to healthy and unhealthy foods (Ghana 121; South Africa 72) and policy stakeholders from government (Health, Agriculture, Trade and Industry, Finance), academia, civil society, development partners, Civil Society Organization (CSO) and private sector (Ghana 28; South Africa 48).

Results: Nutrition was a stated policy priority in both countries; however, policy responsibility was located within the health sector, with limited integration of nutrition into food system sectors (including Agriculture, Trade and Industry). Contributing factors included a conceptions of policy responsibilities for nutrition and food systems, dominant ideas and narratives regarding the economic role of the food industry and the purpose of food system policy, the influence of large food industry actors, and limited institutional structures for cross-sectoral engagement and coordination.

Conclusions: Integrating nutrition into multi-sectoral food policy to achieve multiple food system policy goals will require strategic action across jurisdictions and regional levels. Opportunities included increasing investment in healthy traditional foods, strengthening urban/rural linkages and informal food systems, and strengthening institutional structures for policy coherence and coordination related to nutrition.

References
1.
Fooks G, Williams S, Box G, Sacks G . Corporations' use and misuse of evidence to influence health policy: a case study of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation. Global Health. 2019; 15(1):56. PMC: 6760066. DOI: 10.1186/s12992-019-0495-5. View

2.
Hawkes C, Smith T, Jewell J, Wardle J, Hammond R, Friel S . Smart food policies for obesity prevention. Lancet. 2015; 385(9985):2410-21. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61745-1. View

3.
Balarajan Y, Reich M . Political economy challenges in nutrition. Global Health. 2016; 12(1):70. PMC: 5097844. DOI: 10.1186/s12992-016-0204-6. View

4.
Baker P, Hawkes C, Wingrove K, Demaio A, Parkhurst J, Thow A . What drives political commitment for nutrition? A review and framework synthesis to inform the United Nations Decade of Action on Nutrition. BMJ Glob Health. 2018; 3(1):e000485. PMC: 5841521. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000485. View

5.
Bellon M, Kotu B, Azzarri C, Caracciolo F . To diversify or not to diversify, that is the question. Pursuing agricultural development for smallholder farmers in marginal areas of Ghana. World Dev. 2020; 125:104682. PMC: 6876660. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104682. View