» Articles » PMID: 39600397

Nerve Block Extends Nerve Function Recovery in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Overview
Journal J Pain Res
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Date 2024 Nov 27
PMID 39600397
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Research has revealed that patients with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy exhibit significantly elevated nerve stimulation thresholds. However, the minimum stimulation thresholds of peripheral nerves in patients with diabetic foot, along with the recovery of nerve function, remain undetermined. The aim of this study is to investigate the minimum stimulation thresholds of the femoral and sciatic nerves, as well as the duration of nerve block, in patients diagnosed with diabetic foot.

Methods: From July 2020 to March 2022, a prospective study was conducted involving patients aged 50-80 scheduled for distal lower limb surgery. The study included 83 patients with diabetic foot and 48 individuals without diabetes. Prior to surgery, an ultrasound-guided approach combined with nerve stimulation was employed to administer a popliteal sciatic nerve block (20 mL of ropivacaine 5 mg/mL) and a femoral nerve block (20 mL of ropivacaine 5 mg/mL). During the ultrasound-guided femoral and popliteal sciatic nerve blocks, the electric current required to elicit motor activity in both the femoral and popliteal sciatic nerves was assessed.

Results: The study revealed that patients with diabetic foot exhibited significantly higher stimulation thresholds for femoral and sciatic nerve blocks, as well as a substantially longer duration of femoral and sciatic sensory and motor blocks ( < 0.01). Additionally, nerve injury was observed in 4 patients (4.8%) within the diabetes mellitus (DM) group.

Conclusion: Patients with diabetic foot exhibit higher minimum stimulus thresholds for the femoral and sciatic nerves and experience delayed recovery from ropivacaine block.

Citing Articles

Nerve Block Research in Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Concerns and Suggestions [Response to Letter].

Wei Q, Dai W J Pain Res. 2025; 18():255-258.

PMID: 39846002 PMC: 11752869. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S515063.


Nerve Block Research in Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Concerns and Suggestions [Letter].

Zhu Y, Song W J Pain Res. 2024; 17():4535-4536.

PMID: 39735661 PMC: 11681816. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S511848.

References
1.
van Netten J, Bus S, Apelqvist J, Lipsky B, Hinchliffe R, Game F . Definitions and criteria for diabetic foot disease. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020; 36 Suppl 1:e3268. DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3268. View

2.
Callaghan B, Cheng H, Stables C, Smith A, Feldman E . Diabetic neuropathy: clinical manifestations and current treatments. Lancet Neurol. 2012; 11(6):521-34. PMC: 4254767. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70065-0. View

3.
Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, Malanda B, Karuranga S, Unwin N . Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9 edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019; 157:107843. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843. View

4.
Cho N, Shaw J, Karuranga S, Huang Y, da Rocha Fernandes J, Ohlrogge A . IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018; 138:271-281. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.023. View

5.
Salviz E, Onbasi S, Ozonur A, Orhan-Sungur M, Berkoz O, Tugrul K . Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Properties in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients: A Prospective Observational Study. J Hand Surg Am. 2017; 42(3):190-197. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.01.009. View