» Articles » PMID: 39599361

The RDNA Diversity, Interseasonal Dynamic, and Functional Role of Cyanobacteria in the Sub-Arctic White Sea

Overview
Journal Plants (Basel)
Date 2024 Nov 27
PMID 39599361
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Planktonic unicellular cyanobacteria are the dominant biomass producers and carbon fixers in the global ocean ecosystem, but they are not abundant in polar seawater. The interseasonal dynamics of picocyanobacterial (PC) abundance, picophytoplankton primary production, and phylogenetic diversity of PC were studied in the sub-Arctic White Sea. The PC abundance varied from 0.2-0.3 × 10 cells/L in February to 5.2-16.7 × 10 cells/L in July. Picophytoplankton primary production ranged from 0.22 mg C/m per day in winter to 11.32 mg C/m per day in summer. abundance positively correlated with water temperature and river discharge that increased in recent years in the White Sea. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene and ITS region clone libraries from the White Sea and Barents Sea eDNA revealed picocyanobacterial sequences related to marine subclusters 5.1-I, 5.I-IV, 5.2, and 5.3. All S5.1-I were common in the White and Barents seas and were consistently present in the picophytoplankton composition throughout the year. S5.2 and S5.3 appear in the PC community in summer, suggesting their river origin, and S5.1-IV inhabits only the Barents Sea and was not detected in the White Sea. A unique phylotype was revealed. It is expected that the increase in the abundance of PC and their increasing role in ecosystem functioning, as well as the enrichment of the species composition with new phylotypes in the semi-enclosed sub-Arctic White Sea, which is vulnerable to the effects of climate change, will be characteristic of all Arctic seas in general.

References
1.
Chen F, Wang K, Kan J, Suzuki M, Wommack K . Diverse and unique picocyanobacteria in Chesapeake Bay, revealed by 16S-23S rRNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006; 72(3):2239-43. PMC: 1393199. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.72.3.2239-2243.2006. View

2.
Whitehead L, Long B, Price G, Badger M . Comparing the in vivo function of α-carboxysomes and β-carboxysomes in two model cyanobacteria. Plant Physiol. 2014; 165(1):398-411. PMC: 4012598. DOI: 10.1104/pp.114.237941. View

3.
Nubel U, Garcia-Pichel F, Muyzer G . PCR primers to amplify 16S rRNA genes from cyanobacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997; 63(8):3327-32. PMC: 168636. DOI: 10.1128/aem.63.8.3327-3332.1997. View

4.
Zhang A, Carroll A, Atsumi S . Carbon recycling by cyanobacteria: improving CO2 fixation through chemical production. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2017; 364(16). DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fnx165. View

5.
Strunecky O, Ivanova A, Mares J . An updated classification of cyanobacterial orders and families based on phylogenomic and polyphasic analysis. J Phycol. 2022; 59(1):12-51. DOI: 10.1111/jpy.13304. View