» Articles » PMID: 39599346

Uptake, Translocation, Toxicity, and Impact of Nanoparticles on Plant Physiological Processes

Overview
Journal Plants (Basel)
Date 2024 Nov 27
PMID 39599346
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The application of nanotechnology in agriculture has increased rapidly. However, the fate and effects of various nanoparticles on the soil, plants, and humans are not fully understood. Reports indicate that nanoparticles exhibit positive and negative impacts on biota due to their size, surface property, concentration within the system, and species or cell type under test. In plants, nanoparticles are translocated either by apoplast or symplast pathway or both. Also, it is not clear whether the nanoparticles entering the plant system remain as nanoparticles or are biotransformed into ionic forms or other organic compounds. Controversial results on the toxicity effects of nanomaterials on the plant system are available. In general, the nanomaterial toxicity was exerted by producing reactive oxygen species, leading to damage or denaturation of various biomolecules. The intensity of cyto- and geno-toxicity depends on the physical and chemical properties of nanoparticles. Based on the literature survey, it is observed that the effects of nanoparticles on the growth, photosynthesis, and primary and secondary metabolism of plants are both positive and negative; the response of these processes to the nanoparticle was associated with the type of nanoparticle, the concentration within the tissue, crop species, and stage of growth. Future studies should focus on addressing the key knowledge gaps in understanding the responses of plants to nanoparticles at all levels through global transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome assays and evaluating nanoparticles under field conditions at realistic exposure concentrations to determine the level of entry of nanoparticles into the food chain and assess the impact of nanoparticles on the ecosystem.

References
1.
Neysanian M, Iranbakhsh A, Ahmadvand R, Oraghi Ardebili Z, Ebadi M . Comparative efficacy of selenate and selenium nanoparticles for improving growth, productivity, fruit quality, and postharvest longevity through modifying nutrition, metabolism, and gene expression in tomato; potential benefits and risk assessment. PLoS One. 2020; 15(12):e0244207. PMC: 7748219. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244207. View

2.
Rajaee Behbahani S, Iranbakhsh A, Ebadi M, Majd A, Oraghi Ardebili Z . Red elemental selenium nanoparticles mediated substantial variations in growth, tissue differentiation, metabolism, gene transcription, epigenetic cytosine DNA methylation, and callogenesis in bittermelon (Momordica charantia); an in vitro experiment. PLoS One. 2020; 15(7):e0235556. PMC: 7332037. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235556. View

3.
Kim J, Lee Y, Kim E, Gu S, Sohn E, Seo Y . Exposure of iron nanoparticles to Arabidopsis thaliana enhances root elongation by triggering cell wall loosening. Environ Sci Technol. 2014; 48(6):3477-85. DOI: 10.1021/es4043462. View

4.
Gowtham H, Shilpa N, Singh S, Aiyaz M, Abhilash M, Nataraj K . Toxicological effects of nanoparticles in plants: Mechanisms involved at morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular levels. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2024; 210:108604. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.108604. View

5.
Ma Y, He X, Zhang P, Zhang Z, Guo Z, Tai R . Phytotoxicity and biotransformation of La₂O₃ nanoparticles in a terrestrial plant cucumber (Cucumis sativus). Nanotoxicology. 2011; 5(4):743-53. DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2010.545487. View