» Articles » PMID: 39597777

Outcomes of Bridging Therapy in Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Nov 27
PMID 39597777
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: Liver transplantation (LT) is a method for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with satisfactory outcomes. One of the novel methods for predicting LT outcomes is the Metroticket 2.0 model. The disease in patients initially within the Milan criteria (MC) may progress while on a transplantation waitlist; thus, various transplantation bridging therapy (BT) methods are proposed for patients to stay within the MC and optimize the LT outcome. : We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent LT for HCC at an oncological and transplantation center in northern Poland. Patients who underwent (n = 10) or did not undergo (n = 11) BT were included. The primary endpoints of the study were mortality among the patients, HCC recurrence, and Metroticket 2.0 scores based on LT qualification results and explant pathology outcomes. The median follow-up length was 44.03 months. : Patients who underwent BT had significantly lower Metroticket 2.0 scores and greater AFP concentrations at baseline. At LT, there was no significant difference in Metroticket 2.0 scores or AFP concentrations between the groups. Explant Metroticket 2.0 scores were significantly lower in patients who received BT. A complete pathologic response was achieved in 30.0% of patients who underwent BT. The recurrence-free survival rates were 100% and 90.91% in patients who underwent and did not undergo BT, respectively. Overall survival was 80.0% and 81.81% in patients who underwent and did not undergo BT, respectively. : BT should be considered only as a means of remaining within the LT criteria. Routine BT does not appear to be justified for LT patients.

References
1.
Lai Q, Vitale A, Iesari S, Finkenstedt A, Mennini G, Onali S . The Intention-to-Treat Effect of Bridging Treatments in the Setting of Milan Criteria-In Patients Waiting for Liver Transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2019; 25(7):1023-1033. DOI: 10.1002/lt.25492. View

2.
Golse N, Radenne S, Rode A, Ducerf C, Mabrut J, Merle P . Liver Transplantation After Neoadjuvant Sorafenib Therapy: Preliminary Experience and Literature Review. Exp Clin Transplant. 2016; 16(2):227-236. DOI: 10.6002/ect.2015.0299. View

3.
Nicolini D, Agostini A, Montalti R, Mocchegiani F, Mincarelli C, Mandolesi A . Radiological response and inflammation scores predict tumour recurrence in patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization before liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol. 2017; 23(20):3690-3701. PMC: 5449426. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i20.3690. View

4.
Clavien P, Lesurtel M, Bossuyt P, Gores G, Langer B, Perrier A . Recommendations for liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an international consensus conference report. Lancet Oncol. 2011; 13(1):e11-22. PMC: 3417764. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70175-9. View

5.
Calderaro J, Ziol M, Paradis V, Zucman-Rossi J . Molecular and histological correlations in liver cancer. J Hepatol. 2019; 71(3):616-630. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.06.001. View