Midwife-Led Versus Obstetrician-Led Perinatal Care for Low-Risk Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 1.4 Million Pregnancies

Overview

Journal J Clin Med

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2024 Nov 27

PMID 39597773

Authors

Shyamkumar Sriram

Fahad M Almutairi

Muayad Albadrani

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The optimum model of perinatal care for low-risk pregnancies has been a topic of debate. Obstetrician-led care tends to perform unnecessary interventions, whereas the quality of midwife-led care has been subject to debate. This review aimed to assess whether midwife-led care reduces childbirth intervention and whether this comes at the expense of maternal and neonatal wellbeing. PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched for relevant studies. Studies were checked for eligibility by screening the titles, abstracts, and full texts. We performed meta-analyses using the inverse variance method using RevMan software version 5.3. We pooled data using the risk ratio and mean difference with the 95% confidence interval. This review included 44 studies with 1,397,320 women enrolled. Midwife-led care carried a lower risk of unplanned cesarean and instrumental vaginal deliveries, augmentation of labor, epidural/spinal analgesia, episiotomy, and active management of labor third stage. Women who received midwife-led care had shorter hospital stays and lower risks of infection, manual removal of the placenta, blood transfusion, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Furthermore, neonates delivered under midwife-led care had lower risks of acidosis, asphyxia, transfer to specialist care, and ICU admission. Postpartum hemorrhage, perineal tears, APGAR score < 7, and other outcomes were comparable between the two models of management. Midwife-led care reduced childbirth interventions with favorable maternal and neonatal outcomes in most cases. We recommend assigning low-risk pregnancies to midwife-led perinatal care in health systems with infrastructure allowing for smooth transfer when complications arise. Further research is needed to reflect the situation in low-resource countries.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of birthing ball exercises to reduce labor pain and cesarean rates: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Terres M, de Carvalho Souza M, Costa L, Novaes L, de Avila M, Barros S Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025; .

PMID: 39825901 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07930-3.

References

. Care in normal birth: a practical guide. Technical Working Group, World Health Organization. Birth. 1997; 24(2):121-3. View

Villar J, Carroli G, Piaggio G, Gulmezoglu M . Patterns of routine antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001; (4):CD000934. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000934. View

Scarf V, Rossiter C, Vedam S, Dahlen H, Ellwood D, Forster D . Maternal and perinatal outcomes by planned place of birth among women with low-risk pregnancies in high-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Midwifery. 2018; 62:240-255. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.03.024. View

Hermus M, Boesveld I, Hitzert M, Franx A, de Graaf J, Steegers E . Defining and describing birth centres in the Netherlands - a component study of the Dutch Birth Centre Study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017; 17(1):210. PMC: 5496356. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-017-1375-8. View

Dowswell T, Thornton J, Hewison J, Lilford R, Raisler J, Macfarlane A . Should there be a trial of home versus hospital delivery in the United Kingdom?. BMJ. 1996; 312(7033):753-7. PMC: 2350434. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.312.7033.753. View

Ten Hoope-Bender P, De Bernis L, Campbell J, Downe S, Fauveau V, Fogstad H . Improvement of maternal and newborn health through midwifery. Lancet. 2014; 384(9949):1226-35. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60930-2. View

Burns E, Boulton M, Cluett E, Cornelius V, Smith L . Characteristics, interventions, and outcomes of women who used a birthing pool: a prospective observational study. Birth. 2013; 39(3):192-202. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2012.00548.x. View

Hiraizumi Y, Suzuki S . Perinatal outcomes of low-risk planned home and hospital births under midwife-led care in Japan. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013; 39(11):1500-4. DOI: 10.1111/jog.12094. View

McRae D, Muhajarine N, Stoll K, Mayhew M, Vedam S, Mpofu D . Is model of care associated with infant birth outcomes among vulnerable women? A scoping review of midwifery-led versus physician-led care. SSM Popul Health. 2018; 2:182-193. PMC: 5757823. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.01.007. View

10.

Schroeder L, Patel N, Keeler M, Rocca-Ihenacho L, Macfarlane A . The economic costs of intrapartum care in Tower Hamlets: A comparison between the cost of birth in a freestanding midwifery unit and hospital for women at low risk of obstetric complications. Midwifery. 2016; 45:28-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.11.006. View

11.

Friedman H, Liang M, Banks J . Measuring the cost-effectiveness of midwife-led versus physician-led intrapartum teams in developing countries. Womens Health (Lond). 2015; 11(4):553-64. DOI: 10.2217/WHE.15.18. View

12.

Higgins J, Thompson S . Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002; 21(11):1539-58. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1186. View

13.

Hodnett E, Downe S, Walsh D . Alternative versus conventional institutional settings for birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; (8):CD000012. PMC: 7061256. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000012.pub4. View

14.

Bouvier-Colle M, Ouedraogo C, Dumont A, Vangeenderhuysen C, Salanave B, Decam C . Maternal mortality in West Africa. Rates, causes and substandard care from a prospective survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001; 80(2):113-9. View

15.

Homer C, Thornton C, Scarf V, Ellwood D, Oats J, Foureur M . Birthplace in New South Wales, Australia: an analysis of perinatal outcomes using routinely collected data. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14:206. PMC: 4067683. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-206. View

16.

de Jonge A, Mesman J, Mannien J, Zwart J, Buitendijk S, van Roosmalen J . Severe Adverse Maternal Outcomes among Women in Midwife-Led versus Obstetrician-Led Care at the Onset of Labour in the Netherlands: A Nationwide Cohort Study. PLoS One. 2015; 10(5):e0126266. PMC: 4427485. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126266. View

17.

de Bernis L, Dumont A, Bouillin D, Gueye A, Dompnier J, Bouvier-Colle M . Maternal morbidity and mortality in two different populations of Senegal: a prospective study (MOMA survey). BJOG. 2000; 107(1):68-74. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11581.x. View

18.

Souter V, Nethery E, Lou Kopas M, Wurz H, Sitcov K, Caughey A . Comparison of Midwifery and Obstetric Care in Low-Risk Hospital Births. Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 134(5):1056-1065. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003521. View

19.

Bernitz S, Oian P, Sandvik L, Blix E . Evaluation of satisfaction with care in a midwifery unit and an obstetric unit: a randomized controlled trial of low-risk women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016; 16(1):143. PMC: 4912783. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-0932-x. View

20.

Hutton E, Reitsma A, Simioni J, Brunton G, Kaufman K . Perinatal or neonatal mortality among women who intend at the onset of labour to give birth at home compared to women of low obstetrical risk who intend to give birth in hospital: A systematic review and meta-analyses. EClinicalMedicine. 2019; 14:59-70. PMC: 6833447. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.07.005. View