Embodied Semantics: Early Simultaneous Motor Grounding in First and Second Languages

Overview

Journal Brain Sci

Publisher MDPI

Date 2024 Nov 27

PMID 39595819

Authors

Juliane Britz

Emmanuel Collaud

Lea B Jost

Sayaka Sato

Angelique Bugnon

Michael Mouthon

Jean-Marie Annoni

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background/objectives: Although the embodiment of action-related language is well-established in the mother tongue (L1), less is known about the embodiment of a second language (L2) acquired later in life through formal instruction. We used the high temporal resolution of ERPs and topographic ERP analyses to compare embodiment in L1 and L2 and to investigate whether L1 and L2 are embodied with different strengths at different stages of linguistic processing.

Methods: Subjects were presented with action-related and non-action-related verbs in a silent reading task. Subjects were late French-German and German-French bilinguals, respectively, and we could therefore collapse across languages to avoid common confounding between language (French and German) and order of acquisition (L1, L2).

Results: We could show distinct effects of embodiment and language. Embodiment affected only the sensory and lexical stages of processing with increased strength and power of the N1 component for motor vs. non-motor verbs, and language affected the lexical and semantic stages of processing with stronger P2/N400 components for L2 than for L1. Non-motor verbs elicited a stronger P1 component in L2.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that processing words in L2 requires more effortful processing. Importantly, L1 and L2 are not embodied differently, and embodiment affects early and similar stages of processing in L1 and L2, possibly integrating other process of action-language interaction.

References

Sheikh N, Titone D . The embodiment of emotional words in a second language: An eye-movement study. Cogn Emot. 2015; 30(3):488-500. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1018144. View

Pavlenko A . Affective processing in bilingual speakers: disembodied cognition?. Int J Psychol. 2012; 47(6):405-28. DOI: 10.1080/00207594.2012.743665. View

Eberhard-Moscicka A, Jost L, Fehlbaum L, Pfenninger S, Maurer U . Temporal dynamics of early visual word processing - Early versus late N1 sensitivity in children and adults. Neuropsychologia. 2016; 91:509-518. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.09.014. View

Korinth S, Sommer W, Breznitz Z . Neuronal response specificity as a marker of reading proficiency: two-fold nature of the N170 revealed after massive repetition. Neuroreport. 2012; 24(2):96-100. DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32835d20b1. View

de Zubicaray G, Arciuli J, Kearney E, Guenther F, McMahon K . On the roles of form systematicity and sensorimotor effects in language processing. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022; 49(3):431-444. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001201. View

Monaco E, Mouthon M, Britz J, Sato S, Stefanos-Yakoub I, Annoni J . Embodiment of action-related language in the native and a late foreign language - An fMRI-study. Brain Lang. 2023; 244:105312. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2023.105312. View

Mahe G, Bonnefond A, Doignon-Camus N . Is the impaired N170 print tuning specific to developmental dyslexia? A matched reading-level study with poor readers and dyslexics. Brain Lang. 2013; 127(3):539-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.09.012. View

Vukovic N, Feurra M, Shpektor A, Myachykov A, Shtyrov Y . Primary motor cortex functionally contributes to language comprehension: An online rTMS study. Neuropsychologia. 2017; 96:222-229. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.01.025. View

Kutas M, Hillyard S . Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature. 1984; 307(5947):161-3. DOI: 10.1038/307161a0. View

10.

Chen D, Wang R, Zhang J, Liu C . Perceptual Representations in L1, L2 and L3 Comprehension: Delayed Sentence-Picture Verification. J Psycholinguist Res. 2019; 49(1):41-57. DOI: 10.1007/s10936-019-09670-x. View

11.

Murray M, Brunet D, Michel C . Topographic ERP analyses: a step-by-step tutorial review. Brain Topogr. 2008; 20(4):249-64. DOI: 10.1007/s10548-008-0054-5. View

12.

Alemanno F, Houdayer E, Cursi M, Velikova S, Tettamanti M, Comi G . Action-related semantic content and negation polarity modulate motor areas during sentence reading: an event-related desynchronization study. Brain Res. 2012; 1484:39-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.09.030. View

13.

Levelt W, Roelofs A, Meyer A . A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behav Brain Sci. 2001; 22(1):1-38; discussion 38-75. DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x99001776. View

14.

Vukovic N, Shtyrov Y . Learning with the wave of the hand: Kinematic and TMS evidence of primary motor cortex role in category-specific encoding of word meaning. Neuroimage. 2019; 202:116179. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116179. View

15.

Boulenger V, Roy A, Paulignan Y, Deprez V, Jeannerod M, Nazir T . Cross-talk between language processes and overt motor behavior in the first 200 msec of processing. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006; 18(10):1607-15. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.10.1607. View

16.

Britz J, Michel C . Errors can be related to pre-stimulus differences in ERP topography and their concomitant sources. Neuroimage. 2009; 49(3):2774-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.033. View

17.

Hauk O, Coutout C, Holden A, Chen Y . The time-course of single-word reading: evidence from fast behavioral and brain responses. Neuroimage. 2012; 60(2):1462-77. PMC: 3382728. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.061. View

18.

Tomasino B, Fink G, Sparing R, Dafotakis M, Weiss P . Action verbs and the primary motor cortex: a comparative TMS study of silent reading, frequency judgments, and motor imagery. Neuropsychologia. 2008; 46(7):1915-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.01.015. View

19.

Jirak D, Menz M, Buccino G, Borghi A, Binkofski F . Grasping language--a short story on embodiment. Conscious Cogn. 2010; 19(3):711-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.06.020. View

20.

Dudschig C, de la Vega I, Kaup B . Embodiment and second-language: automatic activation of motor responses during processing spatially associated L2 words and emotion L2 words in a vertical Stroop paradigm. Brain Lang. 2014; 132:14-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.02.002. View