How Built Environment Characteristics Influence Social Interactions During Neighbourhood Walks Among Urban Inhabitants

Overview

Journal Int J Environ Res Public Health

Publisher MDPI

Specialties Environmental Health
Public Health

Date 2024 Nov 27

PMID 39595786

Authors

Sina Kuzuoglu

Troy D Glover

Luke Moyer

Joe Todd

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

As an accessible and low-risk mode of transportation and recreational activity, walking both produces and is produced by socio-spatial urban features. The health benefits of walking transcend physical fitness, remaining integral to mental health and to fostering social connectedness in urban communities. Understanding what drives walking behaviour, therefore, warrants attention from a public health perspective. This qualitative case study focuses on the social interactions of inhabitants during neighbourhood walks and how built environment features influence walking patterns and experience. Using diaries, maps, and semi-structured interviews with 45 inhabitants of a mid-sized Canadian city, this research investigates the influence of permanent and temporary physical features on the perceived quality of inhabitants' walks. The findings show the public visibility of urban modifications influences walking behaviour and improves social interactions, leading to a heightened sense of belonging and community. Inhabitant-led modifications in the urban space were mostly neighbourhood-bound and voyeuristic, whereas administrative interventions were more successful for collectivization. Both types of interventions are argued to foster social connectedness through different mechanisms, with positive impacts on inhabitants' health and wellbeing. The findings underscore the relevance of community-led and administratively planned interventions in built environments in positioning public health policies associated with social cohesion and connectedness.

References

Vanaken G, Danckaerts M . Impact of Green Space Exposure on Children's and Adolescents' Mental Health: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15(12). PMC: 6313536. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15122668. View

Lee I, Buchner D . The importance of walking to public health. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008; 40(7 Suppl):S512-8. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c65d0. View

Leavell M, Leiferman J, Gascon M, Braddick F, Gonzalez J, Litt J . Nature-Based Social Prescribing in Urban Settings to Improve Social Connectedness and Mental Well-being: a Review. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2019; 6(4):297-308. DOI: 10.1007/s40572-019-00251-7. View

Nagel C, Carlson N, Bosworth M, Michael Y . The relation between neighborhood built environment and walking activity among older adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2008; 168(4):461-8. PMC: 2727277. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwn158. View

Nutsford D, Pearson A, Kingham S . An ecological study investigating the association between access to urban green space and mental health. Public Health. 2013; 127(11):1005-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2013.08.016. View

Wood L, Frank L, Giles-Corti B . Sense of community and its relationship with walking and neighborhood design. Soc Sci Med. 2010; 70(9):1381-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.021. View

Owen N, Humpel N, Leslie E, Bauman A, Sallis J . Understanding environmental influences on walking; Review and research agenda. Am J Prev Med. 2004; 27(1):67-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.03.006. View

Aiyer S, Zimmerman M, Morrel-Samuels S, Reischl T . From broken windows to busy streets: a community empowerment perspective. Health Educ Behav. 2014; 42(2):137-47. DOI: 10.1177/1090198114558590. View

Giles-Corti B, Timperio A, Bull F, Pikora T . Understanding physical activity environmental correlates: increased specificity for ecological models. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2005; 33(4):175-81. DOI: 10.1097/00003677-200510000-00005. View

10.

Hand C, Rudman D, Huot S, Gilliland J, Pack R . Toward Understanding Person-Place Transactions in Neighborhoods: A Qualitative-Participatory Geospatial Approach. Gerontologist. 2018; 58(1):89-100. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnx064. View

11.

Rivera E, Veitch J, Loh V, Salmon J, Cerin E, Mavoa S . Outdoor public recreation spaces and social connectedness among adolescents. BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1):165. PMC: 8785371. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-12558-6. View

12.

Umoquit M, Tso P, Burchett H, Dobrow M . A multidisciplinary systematic review of the use of diagrams as a means of collecting data from research subjects: application, benefits and recommendations. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011; 11:11. PMC: 3044920. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-11. View

13.

Oakes J, Forsyth A, Schmitz K . The effects of neighborhood density and street connectivity on walking behavior: the Twin Cities walking study. Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2007; 4:16. PMC: 2228289. DOI: 10.1186/1742-5573-4-16. View

14.

Owen N, Cerin E, Leslie E, duToit L, Coffee N, Frank L . Neighborhood walkability and the walking behavior of Australian adults. Am J Prev Med. 2007; 33(5):387-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.025. View

15.

Leslie E, Saelens B, Frank L, Owen N, Bauman A, Coffee N . Residents' perceptions of walkability attributes in objectively different neighbourhoods: a pilot study. Health Place. 2005; 11(3):227-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2004.05.005. View

16.

Franke T, Sims-Gould J, Nettlefold L, Ottoni C, McKay H . "It makes me feel not so alone": features of the Choose to Move physical activity intervention that reduce loneliness in older adults. BMC Public Health. 2021; 21(1):312. PMC: 7865112. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10363-1. View

17.

Beyer K, Kaltenbach A, Szabo A, Bogar S, Nieto F, Malecki K . Exposure to neighborhood green space and mental health: evidence from the survey of the health of Wisconsin. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014; 11(3):3453-72. PMC: 3987044. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph110303453. View

18.

Montemurro G, Berry T, Spence J, Nykiforuk C, Blanchard C, Cutumisu N . "Walkable by Willpower": resident perceptions of neighbourhood environments. Health Place. 2011; 17(4):895-901. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.04.010. View