» Articles » PMID: 39594696

An Integrated Multimodal-Based CAD System for Breast Cancer Diagnosis

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Nov 27
PMID 39594696
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Breast cancer has been one of the main causes of death among women recently, and it has been the focus of attention of many specialists and researchers in the health field. Because of its seriousness and spread speed, breast cancer-resisting methods, early diagnosis, diagnosis, and treatment have been the points of research discussion. Many computers-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems have been proposed to reduce the load on physicians and increase the accuracy of breast tumor diagnosis. To the best of our knowledge, combining patient information, including medical history, breast density, age, and other factors, with mammogram features from both breasts in craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views has not been previously investigated for breast tumor classification. In this paper, we investigated the effectiveness of using those inputs by comparing two combination approaches. The soft voting approach, produced from statistical information-based models (decision tree, random forest, K-nearest neighbor, Gaussian naive Bayes, gradient boosting, and MLP) and an image-based model (CNN), achieved 90% accuracy. Additionally, concatenating statistical and image-based features in a deep learning model achieved 93% accuracy. We found that it produced promising results that would enhance the CAD systems. As a result, this study finds that using both sides of mammograms outperformed the result of using only the infected side. In addition, integrating the mammogram features with statistical information enhanced the accuracy of the tumor classification. Our findings, based on a novel dataset, incorporate both patient information and four-view mammogram images, covering multiple classes: normal, benign, and malignant.

References
1.
Karaman S, Detmar M . Mechanisms of lymphatic metastasis. J Clin Invest. 2014; 124(3):922-8. PMC: 3938272. DOI: 10.1172/JCI71606. View

2.
Jalalian A, Mashohor S, Mahmud R, Karasfi B, Saripan M, Ramli A . Foundation and methodologies in computer-aided diagnosis systems for breast cancer detection. EXCLI J. 2017; 16:113-137. PMC: 5379115. DOI: 10.17179/excli2016-701. View

3.
Gerami R, Joni S, Akhondi N, Etemadi A, Fosouli M, Foroughi Eghbal A . A literature review on the imaging methods for breast cancer. Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol. 2022; 14(3):171-176. PMC: 9301184. View

4.
Ahmad J, Akram S, Jaffar A, Ali Z, Bhatti S, Ahmad A . Deep learning empowered breast cancer diagnosis: Advancements in detection and classification. PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0304757. PMC: 11239011. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304757. View

5.
Ragab D, Sharkas M, Attallah O . Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using an Efficient CAD System Based on Multiple Classifiers. Diagnostics (Basel). 2019; 9(4). PMC: 6963468. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics9040165. View