Beyond the Surface: A New Perspective on Dual-System Theories in Decision-Making
Overview
Overview
Authors
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract
The current paper provides a critical evaluation of the dual-system approach in cognitive psychology. This evaluation challenges traditional classifications that associate intuitive processes solely with noncompensatory models and deliberate processes with compensatory ones. Instead, it suggests a more nuanced framework where intuitive and deliberate characteristics coexist within both compensatory and noncompensatory processes. This refined understanding of dual-process models has significant implications for improving theoretical models of decision-making, providing a more comprehensive account of the cognitive mechanisms underlying human judgment and choice.
References
1.
Rock I, Kaufman L
. The Moon Illusion, II: The moon's apparent size is a function of the presence or absence of terrain. Science. 1962; 136(3521):1023-31.
DOI: 10.1126/science.136.3521.1023.
View
2.
Ayal S, Zakay D
. The perceived diversity heuristic: the case of pseudodiversity. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009; 96(3):559-73.
DOI: 10.1037/a0013906.
View
3.
Bruine de Bruin W, Parker A, Fischhoff B
. Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007; 92(5):938-956.
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.938.
View
4.
Klein G
. Naturalistic decision making. Hum Factors. 2008; 50(3):456-60.
DOI: 10.1518/001872008X288385.
View
5.
Evans J
. In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003; 7(10):454-9.
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012.
View