» Articles » PMID: 39594290

Dimensions of Job Demands Among New-Generation Employees Based on Online Reviews by Employees

Overview
Date 2024 Nov 27
PMID 39594290
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Based on employees' online reviews, this article analyzes the dimensions of job demand for new-generation employees, using a combination model of Latent Dirichlet Allocation, decision-making trials and evaluation laboratory, interpretative structural modeling, and cross-impact matrix multiplication (LDA-DEMATEL-ISM-MICMAC). The results show that job demand is composed of 10 dimensions, and there is significant interdependence between the dimensions. Changing one dimension will quickly affect the other dimensions. The dimension with the greatest influence degree is leadership and team atmosphere (), while the dimension with the highest affected degree and centrality degree is welfare and promotion (). Leadership and team atmosphere (), company culture and industry (), overall environment and platform (), and platform and technology () were identified as the key factors. They play a causal role in job demand and have a significant impact on other dimensions. Dimensions such as working relationship and intensity (), welfare and promotion (), opportunity and resources (), business and industry development (), corporate prospects and personal development (), and work stress and position () are affected by other dimensions and require special attention. The underlying need is present for the dimension of leadership and team atmosphere (), which has a direct or indirect impact on other dimensions in different ways.

References
1.
Morgeson F, Humphrey S . The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. J Appl Psychol. 2006; 91(6):1321-39. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321. View

2.
Ying S . Guests' Aesthetic experience with lifestyle hotels: An application of LDA topic modelling analysis. Heliyon. 2024; 10(16):e35894. PMC: 11365407. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35894. View

3.
Agi M, Nishant R . Understanding influential factors on implementing green supply chain management practices: An interpretive structural modelling analysis. J Environ Manage. 2016; 188:351-363. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.081. View

4.
Griffiths T, Steyvers M . Finding scientific topics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101 Suppl 1:5228-35. PMC: 387300. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0307752101. View

5.
Wang Z, Wang W, Li D, Wang Y, Yu L, Zhou S . Factors influencing contractors' low-carbon construction behaviors in China: a LDA-DEMATEL-ISM approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024; 31(36):49040-49058. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-024-34433-0. View