» Articles » PMID: 39592933

Human Limits in Machine Learning: Prediction of Potato Yield and Disease Using Soil Microbiome Data

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Nov 26
PMID 39592933
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The preservation of soil health is a critical challenge in the 21st century due to its significant impact on agriculture, human health, and biodiversity. We provide one of the first comprehensive investigations into the predictive potential of machine learning models for understanding the connections between soil and biological phenotypes. We investigate an integrative framework performing accurate machine learning-based prediction of plant performance from biological, chemical, and physical properties of the soil via two models: random forest and Bayesian neural network.

Results: Prediction improves when we add environmental features, such as soil properties and microbial density, along with microbiome data. Different preprocessing strategies show that human decisions significantly impact predictive performance. We show that the naive total sum scaling normalization that is commonly used in microbiome research is one of the optimal strategies to maximize predictive power. Also, we find that accurately defined labels are more important than normalization, taxonomic level, or model characteristics. ML performance is limited when humans can't classify samples accurately. Lastly, we provide domain scientists via a full model selection decision tree to identify the human choices that optimize model prediction power.

Conclusions: Our study highlights the importance of incorporating diverse environmental features and careful data preprocessing in enhancing the predictive power of machine learning models for soil and biological phenotype connections. This approach can significantly contribute to advancing agricultural practices and soil health management.

References
1.
Peschel S, Muller C, von Mutius E, Boulesteix A, Depner M . NetCoMi: network construction and comparison for microbiome data in R. Brief Bioinform. 2020; 22(4). PMC: 8293835. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbaa290. View

2.
Anahtar M, Yang J, Kanjilal S . Applications of Machine Learning to the Problem of Antimicrobial Resistance: an Emerging Model for Translational Research. J Clin Microbiol. 2021; 59(7):e0126020. PMC: 8218744. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01260-20. View

3.
Sen A, Daubin V, Abrouk D, Gifford I, Berry A, Normand P . Phylogeny of the class Actinobacteria revisited in the light of complete genomes. The orders 'Frankiales' and Micrococcales should be split into coherent entities: proposal of Frankiales ord. nov., Geodermatophilales ord. nov., Acidothermales ord..... Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014; 64(Pt 11):3821-3832. DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.063966-0. View

4.
Wagg C, Schlaeppi K, Banerjee S, Kuramae E, van der Heijden M . Fungal-bacterial diversity and microbiome complexity predict ecosystem functioning. Nat Commun. 2019; 10(1):4841. PMC: 6813331. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-12798-y. View

5.
Guseva K, Darcy S, Simon E, Alteio L, Montesinos-Navarro A, Kaiser C . From diversity to complexity: Microbial networks in soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 2022; 169:108604. PMC: 9125165. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108604. View