» Articles » PMID: 39589863

Prophylactic Ablation During Cardiac Surgery in Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials

Abstract

Objectives: Atrial fibrillation is the most common complication of cardiac surgery and occurs frequently in patients without a history of the arrhythmia. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to assess whether prophylactic ablation during cardiac surgery in patients without a history of atrial fibrillation prevents atrial fibrillation.

Methods: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase from inception to August 2024. We included randomized trials of adults without a history of atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac surgery. The intervention of interest was ablation during surgery. We pooled data using random-effects models. The primary outcome was new-onset early postoperative atrial fibrillation within 30 days following surgery. The key secondary outcome was incident clinical atrial fibrillation at follow-up (minimum 6 months). We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool v.2 and evidence quality using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

Results: We included 7 trials (n = 687). The intervention was pulmonary vein isolation in 6 trials and ganglion plexi ablation in 1. Patients who received prophylactic ablation were less likely to have early postoperative atrial fibrillation (21% vs 37%, risk ratio [RR] 0.5, 95% confidence interval 0.3-0.8, I2 = 64%) and incident clinical atrial fibrillation at longest follow-up (range 6 months-2 years; 3% vs 10%, RR 0.3, 95% confidence interval 0.2-0.7, I2 = 0%). The quality of evidence was low.

Conclusions: Prophylactic ablation during cardiac surgery may prevent atrial fibrillation in patients without a history of the arrhythmia. A definitive randomized trial is needed to confirm effects and safety.

Citing Articles

Setting the records straight: surgical ablation misinterpreted and misrepresented in prophylactic studies.

Garcia-Villarreal O Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2025; 40(3).

PMID: 40037814 PMC: 11904303. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivaf055.

References
1.
Al-Atassi T, Toeg H, Malas T, Lam B . Mapping and ablation of autonomic ganglia in prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation in coronary surgery: MAAPPAFS atrial fibrillation randomized controlled pilot study. Can J Cardiol. 2014; 30(10):1202-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.04.018. View

2.
Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View

3.
Healey J, Alings M, Ha A, Leong-Sit P, Birnie D, de Graaf J . Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation in Older Patients. Circulation. 2017; 136(14):1276-1283. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028845. View

4.
Swartz M, Fink G, Lutz C, Taffet S, Berenfeld O, Vikstrom K . Left versus right atrial difference in dominant frequency, K(+) channel transcripts, and fibrosis in patients developing atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Heart Rhythm. 2009; 6(10):1415-22. PMC: 2790556. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.06.018. View

5.
McIntyre W . Post-operative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: Challenges throughout the patient journey. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:1156626. PMC: 10027741. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1156626. View