» Articles » PMID: 39589703

Closing the Loop in the Carbon Cycle: Enzymatic Reactions Housed in Metal-Organic Frameworks for CO Conversion to Methanol

Overview
Date 2024 Nov 26
PMID 39589703
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The preparation of value-added chemicals from carbon dioxide (CO) can act as a way of reducing the greenhouse gas from the atmosphere. Industrially significant C1 chemicals like methanol (CHOH), formic acid (HCOOH), and formaldehyde (HCHO) can be formed from CO. One sustainable way of achieving this is by connecting the reactions catalyzed by the enzymes formate dehydrogenase (FDH), formaldehyde dehydrogenase (FALDH), and alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) into a single cascade reaction where CO is hydrogenated to CHOH. For this to be adaptable for industrial use, the enzymes should be immobilized in materials that are extraordinarily protective of the enzymes, inexpensive, stable, and of ultra-large surface area. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) meet these criteria and are expected to usher in the much-awaited dispensation of industrial biocatalysis. Unfortunately, little is known about the molecular behaviour of MOF-immobilized FDH, FALDH, and ADH. It is also yet not known which MOFs are most promising for industrial enzyme-immobilization since the field of reticular chemistry is growing exponentially with millions of hypothetical and synthesized MOF structures reported at present. This review initially discusses the properties of the key enzymes required for CO hydrogenation to methanol including available cofactor regeneration strategies. Later, the characterization techniques of enzyme-MOF composites and the successes or lack thereof of enzyme-MOF-mediated CO conversion to CHOH and intermediate products are discussed. We also discuss reported multi-enzyme-MOF systems for CO conversion cognizant of the fact that at present, these systems are the only chance of housing cascade-type biochemical reactions where strict substrate channelling and operational conditions are required. Finally, we delve into future perspectives.

References
1.
Choi S, Drese J, Jones C . Adsorbent materials for carbon dioxide capture from large anthropogenic point sources. ChemSusChem. 2009; 2(9):796-854. DOI: 10.1002/cssc.200900036. View

2.
Bhardwaj R, Sharma T, Nguyen D, Cheng C, Lam S, Xia C . Integrated catalytic insights into methanol production: Sustainable framework for CO conversion. J Environ Manage. 2021; 289:112468. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112468. View

3.
Li W, Wang H, Jiang X, Zhu J, Liu Z, Guo X . A short review of recent advances in CO hydrogenation to hydrocarbons over heterogeneous catalysts. RSC Adv. 2022; 8(14):7651-7669. PMC: 9078493. DOI: 10.1039/c7ra13546g. View

4.
Bierbaumer S, Nattermann M, Schulz L, Zschoche R, Erb T, Winkler C . Enzymatic Conversion of CO: From Natural to Artificial Utilization. Chem Rev. 2023; 123(9):5702-5754. PMC: 10176493. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00581. View

5.
Bernhardsgrutter I, Stoffel G, Miller T, Erb T . CO-converting enzymes for sustainable biotechnology: from mechanisms to application. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2021; 67:80-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2021.01.003. View