Tibialis Posterior Tendon Dysfunction Due to Syndesmotic Fixation Using Non-absorbable Suture Button Device Following Fracture-Dislocation of the Ankle: A Case Report

Overview

Journal Cureus

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2024 Nov 26

PMID 39588440

Authors

Aysha Rajeev

Saurav Krishnan

George Koshy

Mintu Mariam Baby

Kailash Devalia

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Fracture-dislocation of the ankle is a common lower limb injury, often associated with syndesmotic damage. While CT and MRI scans are more sensitive than plain radiographs in diagnosing syndesmotic injuries, treatment typically involves either static stabilization using metallic screws or dynamic stabilization with a suture button device. The primary advantage of dynamic stabilization is that it eliminates the need for a second surgery to remove screws. However, chronic syndesmotic injuries can lead to significant morbidity, including pain and impaired function. In patients with inflammatory conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis, dynamic stabilization may result in loosening and migration of the suture button, potentially causing tendon degeneration and rupture. We present the case of a 63-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis who sustained a fracture-dislocation of the ankle. She was treated with open reduction and internal fixation, using a plate, screws, and a suture button device for syndesmotic stabilization. Postoperatively, she developed a plano-valgus deformity due to migration of the suture button into the tibialis posterior tendon and degenerative arthritis of the syndesmosis joint.

References

Willmott H, Singh B, David L . Outcome and complications of treatment of ankle diastasis with tightrope fixation. Injury. 2009; 40(11):1204-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.05.008. View

Kennedy J, Soffe K, Dalla Vedova P, Stephens M, OBrien T, Walsh M . Evaluation of the syndesmotic screw in low Weber C ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2000; 14(5):359-66. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200006000-00010. View

Cataldi C, Bacci N, Colasanti G, Moreschini F, Muratori F, Mondanelli N . Posterior Tibial Tendon Rupture Associated With Anterolateral Distal Tibial and Medial Malleolar Fracture and a Novel Pattern of Tibiofibular Syndesmotic Injury: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2020; 59(5):1066-1071. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2020.02.010. View

Lubberts B, Guss D, Vopat B, Johnson A, van Dijk C, Lee H . The arthroscopic syndesmotic assessment tool can differentiate between stable and unstable ankle syndesmoses. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018; 28(1):193-201. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5229-3. View

Sato R, Tsuchida Y, Murakami H, Shirakawa T, Futamura K, Hasegawa M . Fracture dislocation of the ankle with posterior tibial tendon entrapment within the tibiofibular interosseous space: A case report. Trauma Case Rep. 2019; 23:100235. PMC: 6690664. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcr.2019.100235. View

Bartonicek J, Rammelt S, Kostlivy K, Vanecek V, Klika D, Tresl I . Anatomy and classification of the posterior tibial fragment in ankle fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015; 135(4):505-16. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-015-2171-4. View

Mulligan E . Evaluation and management of ankle syndesmosis injuries. Phys Ther Sport. 2011; 12(2):57-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2011.03.001. View

Rammelt S, Obruba P . An update on the evaluation and treatment of syndesmotic injuries. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015; 41(6):601-14. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-014-0466-8. View

Williams G, Jones M, Amendola A . Syndesmotic ankle sprains in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35(7):1197-207. DOI: 10.1177/0363546507302545. View

10.

Han S, Lee J, Kim S, Suh J, Choi Y . Chronic tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: the diagnostic efficiency of magnetic resonance imaging and comparative analysis of operative treatment. Foot Ankle Int. 2007; 28(3):336-42. DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2007.0336. View

11.

Stuart K, Panchbhavi V . The fate of syndesmotic screws. Foot Ankle Int. 2011; 32(5):S519-25. DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2011.0519. View

12.

Lin C, Gross M, Weinhold P . Ankle syndesmosis injuries: anatomy, biomechanics, mechanism of injury, and clinical guidelines for diagnosis and intervention. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006; 36(6):372-84. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2006.2195. View

13.

van den Bekerom M, Kloen P, Luitse J, Raaymakers E . Complications of distal tibiofibular syndesmotic screw stabilization: analysis of 236 patients. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013; 52(4):456-9. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2013.03.025. View

14.

Pakarinen H, Flinkkila T, Ohtonen P, Hyvonen P, Lakovaara M, Leppilahti J . Intraoperative assessment of the stability of the distal tibiofibular joint in supination-external rotation injuries of the ankle: sensitivity, specificity, and reliability of two clinical tests. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 93(22):2057-61. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01287. View

15.

Storey P, Gadd R, Blundell C, Davies M . Complications of suture button ankle syndesmosis stabilization with modifications of surgical technique. Foot Ankle Int. 2012; 33(9):717-21. DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2012.0717. View

16.

Tourne Y, Molinier F, Andrieu M, Porta J, Barbier G . Diagnosis and treatment of tibiofibular syndesmosis lesions. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019; 105(8S):S275-S286. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.014. View

17.

Boytim M, Fischer D, Neumann L . Syndesmotic ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med. 1991; 19(3):294-8. DOI: 10.1177/036354659101900315. View

18.

Naqvi G, Cunningham P, Lynch B, Galvin R, Awan N . Fixation of ankle syndesmotic injuries: comparison of tightrope fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy of syndesmotic reduction. Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40(12):2828-35. DOI: 10.1177/0363546512461480. View

19.

Kocadal O, Yucel M, Pepe M, Aksahin E, Aktekin C . Evaluation of Reduction Accuracy of Suture-Button and Screw Fixation Techniques for Syndesmotic Injuries. Foot Ankle Int. 2016; 37(12):1317-1325. DOI: 10.1177/1071100716661221. View

20.

Stufkens S, van den Bekerom M, Doornberg J, van Dijk C, Kloen P . Evidence-based treatment of maisonneuve fractures. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010; 50(1):62-7. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2010.08.017. View