» Articles » PMID: 39588077

Anti-interleukin-5/anti-interleukin-5 Receptor α Treatment Improves Self-reported Work Productivity in Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: a Prospective Cohort Trial

Overview
Journal ERJ Open Res
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2024 Nov 26
PMID 39588077
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Severe asthma affects the working life of millions of people worldwide. Interleukin (IL)-5/anti-interleukin-5 receptor α (IL-5Rα) antibodies are highly effective in reducing symptoms in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. We analysed effects of anti-IL-5/anti-IL-5Rα treatment on self-reported productivity and absenteeism at work in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.

Methods: In this prospective single-centre study, patients with severe eosinophilic asthma received a questionnaire assessing their actual occupational status and the influence asthma has on their work life, productivity and missed days at work prior to initiation of antibody treatment and after 6 and 12 months of therapy. Among others, the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) was used.

Results: Out of 54 patients with a median age of 60 years, 27 (50%) were employed. In addition to an increase in asthma control and lung function, self-reported productivity increased significantly with a decrease on the WPAI:SHP from 30% (interquartile range (IQR) 20-50%) to 10% (IQR 0-27.5%) under treatment (p=0.001). Furthermore, self-reported missed days at work were reduced from 2 days·month (IQR 1.75-6 days·month) to 0 days·month (IQR 0-2 days·month; p=0.067). At baseline 22 employed patients (81%) stated they were affected at work by their asthma. After 12 months of treatment, this number decreased to eight patients (30%; p=0.038).

Conclusions: This prospective analysis could prove the substantial impact severe asthma has on patients' working life. Anti-IL-5/anti-IL-5Rα treatment in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma leads to a significant increase in self-reported productivity at work, and after 12 months of treatment patients state substantially fewer negative effects on their working situation.

References
1.
Moore W, Meyers D, Wenzel S, Teague W, Li H, Li X . Identification of asthma phenotypes using cluster analysis in the Severe Asthma Research Program. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009; 181(4):315-23. PMC: 2822971. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200906-0896OC. View

2.
Hyland M, Whalley B, Jones R, Masoli M . A qualitative study of the impact of severe asthma and its treatment showing that treatment burden is neglected in existing asthma assessment scales. Qual Life Res. 2014; 24(3):631-9. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-014-0801-x. View

3.
Pavord I, Korn S, Howarth P, Bleecker E, Buhl R, Keene O . Mepolizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma (DREAM): a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2012; 380(9842):651-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60988-X. View

4.
Milger K, Skowasch D, Hamelmann E, Mummler C, Idzko M, Gappa M . Bronchodilator Reversibility in the GAN Severe Asthma Cohort. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2022; 33(6):446-456. DOI: 10.18176/jiaci.0850. View

5.
Kroes J, Zielhuis S, van Roon E, Ten Brinke A . Prediction of response to biological treatment with monoclonal antibodies in severe asthma. Biochem Pharmacol. 2020; 179:113978. DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.113978. View