» Articles » PMID: 39580388

Comparing HeartModel and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Left Ventricular Volume and Function Evaluation in Patients with Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2024 Nov 23
PMID 39580388
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Integration of artificial intelligence enhances precision, yielding dependable evaluations of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction despite image quality variations. Commercial software like HeartModel provides fully automated 3DE quantification, simplifying the measurement of left chamber volumes and ejection fraction. In this manuscript, we present a cross-sectional study to assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of automated 3D echocardiography (HeartModel) to the standard Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 30 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy referring to the Tehran Heart Center with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and comprehensive 3D transthoracic echocardiography within 24 h were included. All 3D volume analysis was performed with fully automated quantification software (HeartModel) using 3D images of 2,3, and 4-chamber views at the end of systole and diastole.

Results: Excellent Inter- and Intra-observer correlation coefficient was reported for HeartModel software for all indexes. HeartModel displayed a remarkable correlation with cardiac magnetic resonance for left ventricular end-systolic volume index (r = 0.918 and r = 0.911); nevertheless, it underestimated left ventricular end-systolic volume index and left ventricular end-diastolic volume index. Conversely, ejection fraction, stroke volume, and left ventricular mass were overestimated. It was found that manual contour correction can enhance the accuracy of automated model estimations, particularly concerning EF in participants needing correction.

Conclusion: HeartModel software emerges as a rapid and viable imaging approach for evaluating the left ventricle's structure and function. In our study, LV volumes assessed by HeartModel demonstrated strong correlations with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

References
1.
Barbieri A, Bursi F, Camaioni G, Maisano A, Imberti J, Albini A . Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Mass Assessment: Correlation between 2D-Derived Linear Dimensions and 3-Dimensional Automated, Machine Learning-Based Methods in Unselected Patients. J Clin Med. 2021; 10(6). PMC: 8003438. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10061279. View

2.
Naser N, Stankovic I, Neskovic A . The Reliability of Automated Three-Dimensional Echocardiography-HeartModel Versus 2D Echocardiography Simpson Methods in Evaluation of Left Ventricle Volumes and Ejection Fraction in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction. Med Arch. 2022; 76(4):259-266. PMC: 9559669. DOI: 10.5455/medarh.2022.76.259-266. View

3.
Barletta V, Hinojar R, Carbonell A, Gonzalez-Gomez A, Fabiani I, Di Bello V . Three-dimensional full automated software in the evaluation of the left ventricle function: from theory to clinical practice. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018; 34(8):1205-1213. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-018-1336-y. View

4.
Tsang W, Salgo I, Medvedofsky D, Takeuchi M, Prater D, Weinert L . Transthoracic 3D Echocardiographic Left Heart Chamber Quantification Using an Automated Adaptive Analytics Algorithm. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016; 9(7):769-782. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.12.020. View

5.
Levy F, Iacuzio L, Schouver E, Essayagh B, Civaia F, Dommerc C . Performance of a new fully automated transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiographic software for quantification of left cardiac chamber size and function: Comparison with 3 Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance. J Clin Ultrasound. 2019; 47(9):546-554. DOI: 10.1002/jcu.22764. View