» Articles » PMID: 39578924

Fractures in Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Are Associated with a Decreased Medial Keel-cortex Distance of the Tibial Implant

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2024 Nov 23
PMID 39578924
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This retrospective single-center study aimed to investigate incidence and risk factors influencing tibial periprosthetic fractures (TPF) in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), with a specific focus on tibial component positioning and sizing.

Methods: A total of 2063 patients with medial UKA using the Oxford® mobile partial knee implant were analyzed between July 2014 and September 2022. Various preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters determining pre- and postoperative alignment and implant positioning, incidence and characteristics of periprosthetic fractures, and patient demographics were assessed. Statistical analyses, including Mann-Whitney U test and logistic regression, were conducted to identify significant associations and predictors of tibial fractures.

Results: Of the 1853 cases that were finally included in the study, 19 (1%) patients experienced TPF. The fracture group presented with a significantly shorter relative mediolateral and posteroanterior distance between the keel and cortex [mediolateral: 23.3% (23.2-24.8%) versus 27.1% (25.7-28.3%), p < 0.001; posteroanterior: 8.4% (6.3-10.3%) versus 10.0% (9.8-10.1%), p = 0.004]. Additionally, an increased posterior tibial slope in pre- and postoperative radiographs [preoperative: 10.4° (8.6-11.1°) versus 7.7° (5.4-10.0°), p < 0.001; postoperative 9.1° ± 3.1° versus 7.5° (5.9-9.0°), p = 0.030] was observed in the fracture group. Furthermore, the use of smaller-sized implants (AA) was associated with higher fracture rates (p < 0.001). Anatomical variants, such as a medial overhanging tibial plateau, were not observed.

Conclusions: In UKA, type Oxford TPF are linked to shorter mediolateral and posteroanterior keel-cortex distances, increased pre- and postoperative PTS, and small implant sizes (AA). Fracture lines often extend from the distal keel to the medial tibial cortex. These findings emphasize the importance of precise implant positioning and sizing to minimize fracture risk. Level of evidence Retrospective single-center study, III.

References
1.
Pandit H, Murray D, Dodd C, Deo S, Waite J, Goodfellow J . Medial tibial plateau fracture and the Oxford unicompartmental knee. Orthopedics. 2007; 30(5 Suppl):28-31. View

2.
Yoshikawa R, Hiranaka T, Okamoto K, Fujishiro T, Hida Y, Kamenaga T . The Medial Eminence Line for Predicting Tibial Fracture Risk after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg. 2020; 12(2):166-170. PMC: 7237250. DOI: 10.4055/cios19011. View

3.
Hamilton T, Pandit H, Lombardi A, Adams J, Oosthuizen C, Clave A . Radiological Decision Aid to determine suitability for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: development and preliminary validation. Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-B(10 Supple B):3-10. PMC: 5047136. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B10.BJJ-2016-0432.R1. View

4.
Vasso M, Del Regno C, DAmelio A, Viggiano D, Corona K, Panni A . Minor varus alignment provides better results than neutral alignment in medial UKA. Knee. 2015; 22(2):117-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.12.004. View

5.
Wood M, Al-Jabri T, Maniar A, Stelzhammer T, Lanting B, Giannoudis P . Periprosthetic tibial fracture as a complication of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Current insights. Injury. 2024; 55(8):111654. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111654. View