» Articles » PMID: 39576322

Application of Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Lesions: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Date 2024 Nov 22
PMID 39576322
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted technologies, including endoscopy, voice analysis, and histopathology, for detecting and classifying laryngeal lesions.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, etc. for studies utilizing voice analysis, histopathology for laryngeal lesions, or AI-assisted endoscopy. The results of diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were synthesized by a meta-analysis.

Results: 12 studies employing AI-assisted endoscopy, 2 studies for voice analysis, and 4 studies for histopathology were included in the meta-analysis. The combined sensitivity of AI-assisted endoscopy was 91% (95% CI 87-94%) for the classification of benign from malignant lesions and 91% (95% CI 90-93%) for lesion detection. The highest accuracy pooled in detecting lesions versus healthy tissue was the AI-aided endoscopy was 94% (95% CI 92-97%).

Conclusions: For laryngeal lesions, AI-assisted endoscopy shows excellent diagnosis accuracy. But more sizable prospective trials are needed to confirm the practical clinical value.

Citing Articles

Clinical and Pathological Staging Discrepancies in Laryngeal Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Pecorari G, Lorenzi A, Caria M, Motatto G, Riva G Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39941822 PMC: 11815896. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17030455.

References
1.
Zhou X, Ma L, Brown W, Little J, Chen A, Myers L . Automatic detection of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma on pathologic slides using polarized hyperspectral imaging and machine learning. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2021; 11603. PMC: 8699168. DOI: 10.1117/12.2582330. View

2.
Fleskens S, Bergshoeff V, Voogd A, van Velthuysen M, Bot F, Speel E . Interobserver variability of laryngeal mucosal premalignant lesions: a histopathological evaluation. Mod Pathol. 2011; 24(7):892-8. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2011.50. View

3.
Sampieri C, Baldini C, Azam M, Moccia S, Mattos L, Vilaseca I . Artificial Intelligence for Upper Aerodigestive Tract Endoscopy and Laryngoscopy: A Guide for Physicians and State-of-the-Art Review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023; 169(4):811-829. DOI: 10.1002/ohn.343. View

4.
Nakajo K, Ninomiya Y, Kondo H, Takeshita N, Uchida E, Aoyama N . Anatomical classification of pharyngeal and laryngeal endoscopic images using artificial intelligence. Head Neck. 2023; 45(6):1549-1557. DOI: 10.1002/hed.27370. View

5.
Wu Q, Wang X, Liang G, Luo X, Zhou M, Deng H . Advances in Image-Based Artificial Intelligence in Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery: A Systematic Review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023; 169(5):1132-1142. DOI: 10.1002/ohn.391. View