» Articles » PMID: 39575046

Comparative Effectiveness of Endoscopic Versus Pharmacological Interventions for Variceal Rebleeding in Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2024 Nov 22
PMID 39575046
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Variceal bleeding is a critical complication in cirrhotic patients, significantly increasing morbidity and mortality risks, particularly after an initial bleeding episode. This systematic review evaluates and compares the effectiveness of endoscopic and pharmacological interventions in preventing variceal rebleeding. A comprehensive search of major databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science, was conducted to identify studies published within the past decade. The review focused on randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and meta-analyses that assessed the efficacy and safety of these treatments in adult cirrhotic patients with a history of variceal bleeding. The findings suggest that endoscopic interventions, such as band ligation and early transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement, effectively reduce immediate rebleeding rates and improve short-term survival, particularly in high-risk patients with advanced cirrhosis. In contrast, pharmacological strategies, including beta-blockers and vasoactive agents, provide effective long-term management with fewer adverse events, especially in patients with milder liver disease. The review underscores the importance of a personalized treatment approach that integrates both endoscopic and pharmacological therapies to optimize outcomes and reduce the burden of rebleeding. It also highlights the need for further high-quality research to clarify the long-term benefits, impact on quality of life, and cost-effectiveness of these interventions. These insights form the basis for refining clinical guidelines and improving patient-centered care in the management of variceal rebleeding.

References
1.
Romcea A, Tantau M, Seicean A, Pascu O . Variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients: risk factors, evolution, treatment. Clujul Med. 2015; 86(2):107-10. PMC: 4462429. View

2.
Gunarathne L, Rajapaksha H, Shackel N, Angus P, Herath C . Cirrhotic portal hypertension: From pathophysiology to novel therapeutics. World J Gastroenterol. 2020; 26(40):6111-6140. PMC: 7596642. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i40.6111. View

3.
Murillo Pineda M, Siu Xiao T, Sanabria Herrera E, Ayala Aguilar A, Arriaga Escamilla D, Aleman Reyes A . The Prediction and Treatment of Bleeding Esophageal Varices in the Artificial Intelligence Era: A Review. Cureus. 2024; 16(3):e55786. PMC: 10999134. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.55786. View

4.
Dardari L, Taha M, Dahat P, Toriola S, Satnarine T, Zohara Z . The Efficacy of Carvedilol in Comparison to Propranolol in Reducing the Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient and Decreasing the Risk of Variceal Bleeding in Adult Cirrhotic Patients: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2023; 15(8):e43253. PMC: 10416553. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43253. View

5.
Lin L, Du S, Fu Y, Gu H, Wang L, Jian Z . Combination therapy versus pharmacotherapy, endoscopic variceal ligation, or the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt alone in the secondary prevention of esophageal variceal bleeding: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Oncotarget. 2017; 8(34):57399-57408. PMC: 5593651. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18143. View