» Articles » PMID: 39570912

Setting Limits: Ethical Thresholds to the CEO-worker Pay Gap

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2024 Nov 21
PMID 39570912
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the discussion about wage inequality, principles of fairness and need for incentives are juxtaposed as opposing motivations for wage inequality acceptance. While previous literature focused on ideal inequality, in two correlational and one preregistered experimental study (Ntotal = 664) we tested the hypothesis of a threshold of inequality acceptance. Participants were asked to indicate what a Chief Executive Officer should earn, ideally (i.e., ideal pay gap) and at maximum (i.e., highest acceptable pay gap), given the wage of a worker. Results showed that individuals generally indicated higher values for highest acceptable than for ideal pay gaps. Study 2 also provides evidence for a minimum degree of inequality that is deemed necessary. Additionally, across studies men preferred and tolerated greater wage inequality than women. In conclusion, these studies provide evidence for a threshold of inequality acceptance and pave the way for new research on the cognitive and motivational underpinnings of attitudes towards economic inequalities.

References
1.
Ghasemi A, Zahediasl S . Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2013; 10(2):486-9. PMC: 3693611. DOI: 10.5812/ijem.3505. View

2.
Norton M, Ariely D . Building a Better America-One Wealth Quintile at a Time. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015; 6(1):9-12. DOI: 10.1177/1745691610393524. View

3.
Jost J, Kay A . Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005; 88(3):498-509. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498. View

4.
Kiatpongsan S, Norton M . How Much (More) Should CEOs Make? A Universal Desire for More Equal Pay. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015; 9(6):587-93. DOI: 10.1177/1745691614549773. View

5.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A, Buchner A . G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39(2):175-91. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193146. View