» Articles » PMID: 39570910

Modeling the Health and Economic Implications of Adopting a 1-dose 9-valent Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Program in Adolescents in Low/middle-income Countries: An Analysis of Indonesia

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2024 Nov 21
PMID 39570910
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Recent evidence suggests that 1 dose of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine may have similar effectiveness in reducing HPV infection risk compared to 2 or 3 doses.

Objective: To evaluate the public health impact and cost-effectiveness of implementing a 1-dose or a 2-dose program of the 9-valent HPV vaccine in a low- and middle-income country (LMIC).

Methods: We adapted a dynamic transmission model to the Indonesia setting, and conducted a probabilistic sensitivity analysis using distributions reflecting the uncertainty in levels and durability of protection of a 1-dose that were estimated under a Bayesian framework incorporating 3-year vaccine efficacy data from the KEN SHE trial (base-case) and 10 year effectiveness data from the India IARC study (alternative analysis). Scenarios included different coverage levels targeted at girls-only, or girls and boys. Costs and benefits were computed over 100 years from a national single-payer perspective.

Results: Depending on the coverage and target population, the median number of cancer cases avoided in 2-dose programs ranged between 600,000-2,100,000, compared to 200,000-600,000 in 1-dose programs. The 1-dose programs are unlikely to be cost-effective compared to 2-dose programs even at low willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds. The girls-only 2-dose program tends to be cost-effective at lower WTP thresholds, particularly in scenarios with high coverage, dose price and discount rate, while the girls and boys 2-dose program is cost-effective at higher WTP thresholds. In the alternative analysis, 1-dose programs have higher probability of being cost-effective compared to the base-case, particularly for low WTP thresholds (less than 0.5 GDP) and for high coverage, dose price and discount rate.

Conclusion: Adoption of 1-dose programs with 9-valent vaccine in an LMIC resulted in more vaccine-preventable HPV-related cancer cases than 2-dose programs. The 2-dose programs were more likely to be cost-effective than 1-dose programs for a wide range of WTP thresholds and scenarios.

References
1.
Barnabas R, Brown E, Onono M, Bukusi E, Njoroge B, Winer R . Single-dose HPV vaccination efficacy among adolescent girls and young women in Kenya (the KEN SHE Study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021; 22(1):661. PMC: 8475401. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05608-8. View

2.
Zeng Y, Moscicki A, Woo H, Hsu C, Kemp T, Pinto L . HPV16/18 Antibody Responses After a Single Dose of Nonavalent HPV Vaccine. Pediatrics. 2023; 152(1). PMC: 10312231. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-060301. View

3.
Baisley K, Kemp T, Kreimer A, Basu P, Changalucha J, Hildesheim A . Comparing one dose of HPV vaccine in girls aged 9-14 years in Tanzania (DoRIS) with one dose of HPV vaccine in historical cohorts: an immunobridging analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2022; 10(10):e1485-e1493. PMC: 9638025. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00306-0. View

4.
Kreimer A, Herrero R, Sampson J, Porras C, Lowy D, Schiller J . Evidence for single-dose protection by the bivalent HPV vaccine-Review of the Costa Rica HPV vaccine trial and future research studies. Vaccine. 2018; 36(32 Pt A):4774-4782. PMC: 6054558. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.12.078. View

5.
Luxembourg A, Moeller E . 9-Valent human papillomavirus vaccine: a review of the clinical development program. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2017; 16(11):1119-1139. DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2017.1383158. View