» Articles » PMID: 39567469

Causal Relationship Between Physical Activity and Body Weight: A Maximum Likelihood Treatment Effect Model Approach Using Australian Longitudinal Data

Overview
Journal Int J Behav Med
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Date 2024 Nov 20
PMID 39567469
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: More than two-thirds of Australians are overweight. Existing research based on non-experimental data has primarily established associations, rather than causal inferences, between physical activity (PA) and body mass index (BMI). PA and BMI likely affect each other, a reciprocal interplay most studies overlook. We investigate the causal relationship between PA and BMI using a quasi-experimental approach to overcome reverse causality bias.

Method: A maximum likelihood treatment effect model, a quasi-experimental method, was employed. Data was from an observational longitudinal dataset of 130,397 observations with 19,677 unique individuals aged 15-64 (52% are females) from the Household, Income, and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey 2006-2019. We first tested for the reverse relationships (whereby overweight limits PA) before estimating the effect of PA on BMI.

Results: The first-stage modelling results showed that overweight and obese adults are less likely to engage in PA, as are those resource constrained (time or socioeconomically). In the second modelling stage, there was a clear and significant effect of PA on BMI. Being physically active more than three times a week led to a 2.55-point reduction in BMI (p < 0.001). For women, this effect was more pronounced, with a 2.92-point reduction (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: This study leverages existing longitudinal data to provide causal estimates of PA on BMI-finding that PA reduces BMI, particularly for women. As many individuals face resource constraints, campaigns to promote behavioural change need to be nuanced and shift some of the responsibility for physically activity from individuals to policy and organizational reforms.

References
1.
Aguero J, Beleche T . Health shocks and their long-lasting impact on health behaviors: Evidence from the 2009 H1N1 pandemic in Mexico. J Health Econ. 2017; 54:40-55. PMC: 7114327. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.03.008. View

2.
Ball K, Crawford D . Socioeconomic status and weight change in adults: a review. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 60(9):1987-2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.056. View

3.
Cerin E, Leslie E . How socio-economic status contributes to participation in leisure-time physical activity. Soc Sci Med. 2008; 66(12):2596-609. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.02.012. View

4.
Cleland V, Ball K, Crawford D . Socioeconomic position and physical activity among women in Melbourne, Australia: does the use of different socioeconomic indicators matter?. Soc Sci Med. 2012; 74(10):1578-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.01.031. View

5.
Creasy S, Lang W, Tate D, Davis K, Jakicic J . Pattern of Daily Steps is Associated with Weight Loss: Secondary Analysis from the Step-Up Randomized Trial. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2018; 26(6):977-984. PMC: 5970037. DOI: 10.1002/oby.22171. View